On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:05:37AM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> Quoting Laurent Vivier (2017-06-01 08:36:36)
> > On 01/06/2017 03:52, David Gibson wrote:
> > > Currently implementations of the RTAS calls related to DRCs are in
> > > spapr_rtas.c. They belong better in spapr_drc.c - that way
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> Quoting David Gibson (2017-05-31 20:52:15)
> > Currently implementations of the RTAS calls related to DRCs are in
> > spapr_rtas.c. They belong better in spapr_drc.c - that way they're closer
> > to related code, and we'll be able to
Quoting Laurent Vivier (2017-06-01 08:36:36)
> On 01/06/2017 03:52, David Gibson wrote:
> > Currently implementations of the RTAS calls related to DRCs are in
> > spapr_rtas.c. They belong better in spapr_drc.c - that way they're closer
> > to related code, and we'll be able to make some more
Quoting David Gibson (2017-05-31 20:52:15)
> Currently implementations of the RTAS calls related to DRCs are in
> spapr_rtas.c. They belong better in spapr_drc.c - that way they're closer
> to related code, and we'll be able to make some more things local.
>
> spapr_rtas.c was intended to
On 01/06/2017 03:52, David Gibson wrote:
> Currently implementations of the RTAS calls related to DRCs are in
> spapr_rtas.c. They belong better in spapr_drc.c - that way they're closer
> to related code, and we'll be able to make some more things local.
>
> spapr_rtas.c was intended to contain
Currently implementations of the RTAS calls related to DRCs are in
spapr_rtas.c. They belong better in spapr_drc.c - that way they're closer
to related code, and we'll be able to make some more things local.
spapr_rtas.c was intended to contain the RTAS infrastructure and core calls
that don't
