Oops, just realized I got RTH's email wrong on the cc. Sorry...
-- PMM
On 8 January 2015 at 12:19, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
For historical reasons, the define for the shmat() syscall on Alpha is
NR_osf_shmat; however it has the same semantics as this syscall does
on all
On 01/10/2015 07:56 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
#define TARGET_NR_osf_shmat209
+/* this has the usual shmat semantics so give it the name syscall.c expects
+ * so that our support for it is enabled.
+ */
+#define TARGET_NR_shmat TARGET_NR_osf_shmat
Eh, you could just s/osf_// on
For historical reasons, the define for the shmat() syscall on Alpha is
NR_osf_shmat; however it has the same semantics as this syscall does
on all other architectures, so define TARGET_NR_shmat as well so that
QEMU's code for the syscall is enabled.
This patch brings our behaviour on the LTP
