On 06/09/2017 10:55 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>
>> These belong in comments in the test proper, because it is not obvious
>> otherwise. But with comments added (so someone debugging a theoretical
>> test failure down the road knows what they are up against),
>
> # Note that the reference output int
Am 09.06.2017 um 16:16 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 06/09/2017 07:58 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 09.06.2017 um 14:14 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> >> On 06/09/2017 06:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>> When qemu is exited, all running jobs should be cancelled successfully.
> >>> This adds a test f
On 06/09/2017 07:58 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 09.06.2017 um 14:14 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> On 06/09/2017 06:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> When qemu is exited, all running jobs should be cancelled successfully.
>>> This adds a test for this for all types of block jobs that currently
>>> exist
Am 09.06.2017 um 14:14 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 06/09/2017 06:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > When qemu is exited, all running jobs should be cancelled successfully.
> > This adds a test for this for all types of block jobs that currently
> > exist in qemu.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
On 06/09/2017 06:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> When qemu is exited, all running jobs should be cancelled successfully.
> This adds a test for this for all types of block jobs that currently
> exist in qemu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
> ---
> tests/qemu-iotests/185 | 189
> ++
When qemu is exited, all running jobs should be cancelled successfully.
This adds a test for this for all types of block jobs that currently
exist in qemu.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
---
tests/qemu-iotests/185 | 189 +
tests/qemu-iotests/185.out |
