Now that we have get_S1prot, we can apply it to get_phys_addr_v6
for a minor code cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones
---
target-arm/helper.c | 27 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
index 20e5753b
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Now that we have get_S1prot, we can apply it to get_phys_addr_v6
> for a minor code cleanup.
Actually, I should point out that this isn't just a cleanup, but
also a fix. See below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones
> ---
> target-ar
On 12 February 2015 at 17:08, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
>> Now that we have get_S1prot, we can apply it to get_phys_addr_v6
>> for a minor code cleanup.
I think this is a bad idea -- better to keep the long
and short descriptor code paths
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:57:27PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 12 February 2015 at 17:08, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >> Now that we have get_S1prot, we can apply it to get_phys_addr_v6
> >> for a minor code cleanup.
>
> I think thi
On 10 March 2015 at 16:54, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:57:27PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 12 February 2015 at 17:08, Andrew Jones wrote:
>> > Actually, I should point out that this isn't just a cleanup, but
>> > also a fix. See below.
>>
>> > The original code didn't t
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:03:48PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 March 2015 at 16:54, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:57:27PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 12 February 2015 at 17:08, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >> > Actually, I should point out that this isn't just a clea
