On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:52:32PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu
> wrote:
> > Backend crash may be not that normal in production usage, it is in
> > development stage. It would be handy if we can handle that as well,
> > as it's a painful e
Hi
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu
wrote:
> Backend crash may be not that normal in production usage, it is in
> development stage. It would be handy if we can handle that as well,
> as it's a painful experience for me that every time I do a VM2VM test
> and once my changes to backe
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 07:00:15PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu
> wrote:
> >> > The following series starts from the idea that the slave can request a
> >> > "managed" shutdown instead and later recover (I guess the use case for
> >> > this
On 2016/03/28 10:53, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/03/26 3:00, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu
>> wrote:
> The following series starts from the idea that the slave can request a
> "managed" shutdown instead and later recover (I guess the
On 2016/03/26 3:00, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu
> wrote:
The following series starts from the idea that the slave can request a
"managed" shutdown instead and later recover (I guess the use case for
this is to allow for example to u
Hi
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Yuanhan Liu
wrote:
>> > The following series starts from the idea that the slave can request a
>> > "managed" shutdown instead and later recover (I guess the use case for
>> > this is to allow for example to update static dispatching/filter rules
>> > etc)
>
>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:33:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:09:52AM +0200, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Marc-André Lureau
> >
> > In a previous series "Add feature to start QEMU without vhost-user
> > backend", Tetsuya Mukawa proposed to allow
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 07:00:27PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I'm still not sure users actually need this. I am inclined to think we
> > should teach guests to respond to NEED_RESET status. Then to handle
> > disconnec
Hi
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I'm still not sure users actually need this. I am inclined to think we
> should teach guests to respond to NEED_RESET status. Then to handle
> disconnect, we would
> - deactivate the disconnected backend
> - stop VM, and wait for a
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:09:52AM +0200, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> In a previous series "Add feature to start QEMU without vhost-user
> backend", Tetsuya Mukawa proposed to allow the vhost-user backend to
> disconnect and reconnect. However, Michael Tsirkin
From: Marc-André Lureau
In a previous series "Add feature to start QEMU without vhost-user
backend", Tetsuya Mukawa proposed to allow the vhost-user backend to
disconnect and reconnect. However, Michael Tsirkin pointed out that
you can't do that without extra care, because the guest and hyperviso
11 matches
Mail list logo
