Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3 0/3] ioport fixes

2015-04-01 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 01/04/2015 11:10, Peter Maydell wrote: >> > Peter, if you prefer you can just revert c3c1bb99. > Given the SPARC reset breakage also, I agree with you > (in the other thread) that we should revert c3c1bb99 > for 2.3, and fix this all properly in 2.4. Yup, pull request coming. Paolo

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3 0/3] ioport fixes

2015-04-01 Thread Peter Maydell
On 30 March 2015 at 12:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > These fix the problem with OpenBIOS's accesses to the VBE DISPI ports. > The problem stems from weird memory regions created by ioport.c. > > Patches 1-3 simplify some of the MemoryRegionPortio arrays. This makes it > easier to ascertain the effec

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3 0/3] ioport fixes

2015-03-31 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
On 30/03/15 12:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > These fix the problem with OpenBIOS's accesses to the VBE DISPI ports. > The problem stems from weird memory regions created by ioport.c. > > Patches 1-3 simplify some of the MemoryRegionPortio arrays. This makes it > easier to ascertain the effect of pa

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3 0/3] ioport fixes

2015-03-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
These fix the problem with OpenBIOS's accesses to the VBE DISPI ports. The problem stems from weird memory regions created by ioport.c. Patches 1-3 simplify some of the MemoryRegionPortio arrays. This makes it easier to ascertain the effect of patch 6, since the patch only affects MemoryRegionPor