On 2012-09-09 16:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/20/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> No need to expose the fd-based interface, everyone will already be fine
>> with the more handy EventNotifier variant. Rename the latter to clarify
>> that we are still talking about irqfds here.
>
> Thanks, appli
On 08/20/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> No need to expose the fd-based interface, everyone will already be fine
> with the more handy EventNotifier variant. Rename the latter to clarify
> that we are still talking about irqfds here.
Thanks, applied.
>
> -int kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd(KVMState *
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 10:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> No need to expose the fd-based interface, everyone will already be fine
> with the more handy EventNotifier variant. Rename the latter to clarify
> that we are still talking about irqfds here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
> ---
>
> Alex, pl
No need to expose the fd-based interface, everyone will already be fine
with the more handy EventNotifier variant. Rename the latter to clarify
that we are still talking about irqfds here.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
Alex, please update your vfio patch accordingly.
hw/virtio-pci.c |4 ++-