On 12/18/2015 08:52 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Cao jin writes:
There is TYPE_ICH9_AHCI definition in ahci.h when QOMify it, seems it
is missed.
Signed-off-by: Cao jin
---
hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the explanation, it make me aware that why there are lots of
"plain_text_for_device":)
forget it please.
On 12/18/2015 09:01 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 18 December 2015 at 12:52, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Cao jin writes:
There is TYPE_ICH9_AHCI definition in ahci.h when QOMify it, seems it
is missed.
Signed-off-by: Cao jin
---
hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_q35.c b/hw/i386/pc_q35.c
index 9a12068..aa34a07 100644
---
Cao jin writes:
> There is TYPE_ICH9_AHCI definition in ahci.h when QOMify it, seems it
> is missed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin
> ---
> hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_q35.c
On 18 December 2015 at 12:52, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Cao jin writes:
>
>> There is TYPE_ICH9_AHCI definition in ahci.h when QOMify it, seems it
>> is missed.
> I suspect there are more instances of the same problem.
> Not sure how interested we