On 26.09.2012 18:56, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 26.09.2012 17:46, Anthony Liguori wrote:
[]
This is a good example of where we need improved documentation but I
agree 100% with Peter.
So what do we do?
We've a clear bug, I can only fix it in the patch to the Debian
package, since I've
On 27 October 2012 12:23, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
I still don't see why
-nographic -daemonize
makes no sence while
-curses -daemonize
does?
My vote is that neither of these combinations makes sense.
-- PMM
On 27.10.2012 15:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 27 October 2012 12:23, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
I still don't see why
-nographic -daemonize
makes no sence while
-curses -daemonize
does?
My vote is that neither of these combinations makes sense.
I agree. Well, almost --
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
On 27.10.2012 15:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 27 October 2012 12:23, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
I still don't see why
-nographic -daemonize
makes no sence while
-curses -daemonize
does?
My vote is
On 27.10.2012 16:48, Blue Swirl wrote:
[]
I'd rather have -nographic work with -daemonize, since the
alternative - shown in the patch comment - is rather long and
it is easy to forget to nullify some option, while -nographic
can do that easy and it is convinient, but if people dislikes
such
On 27.10.2012 16:55, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 27.10.2012 16:48, Blue Swirl wrote:
[]
I'd rather have -nographic work with -daemonize, since the
alternative - shown in the patch comment - is rather long and
it is easy to forget to nullify some option, while -nographic
can do that easy and it
On 26.09.2012 01:19, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Combining -nographic and -daemonize don't make sense. I'd rather error
out with this combination.
I think what the user is after is -daemonize -vga none OR -daemonize
-display none.
So what's the difference?
I know lots of people use -nographic
On 26 September 2012 08:09, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
On 26.09.2012 01:19, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Combining -nographic and -daemonize don't make sense. I'd rather error
out with this combination.
I think what the user is after is -daemonize -vga none OR -daemonize
-display
On 26.09.2012 12:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
I know lots of people use -nographic -daemonize to run headless
guests in background (like, for example, a router). I guess it
come way before -vga option has been introduced, but at least I
know about -vga (but not about -vga none). For one, I
On 26 September 2012 09:17, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
On 26.09.2012 12:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
I know lots of people use -nographic -daemonize to run headless
guests in background (like, for example, a router). I guess it
come way before -vga option has been introduced, but at
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org writes:
On 26 September 2012 09:17, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
On 26.09.2012 12:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
I know lots of people use -nographic -daemonize to run headless
guests in background (like, for example, a router). I guess it
come
On 26.09.2012 17:46, Anthony Liguori wrote:
[]
This is a good example of where we need improved documentation but I
agree 100% with Peter.
So what do we do?
We've a clear bug, I can only fix it in the patch to the Debian
package, since I've been asked about this bug multiple times,
and I care
Current code binds monitor and serial port to the guest console
unless -nographic is specified, which is okay. But when there's
no guest console (-nographic), the code tries to use stdio for
the same default devices. But it does not check for -daemonize
at the same time -- because when
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru writes:
Current code binds monitor and serial port to the guest console
unless -nographic is specified, which is okay. But when there's
no guest console (-nographic), the code tries to use stdio for
the same default devices. But it does not check for
14 matches
Mail list logo
