On Tue, 11/28 14:44, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > Yes, I can bring in through my tree, unless Fam prefers to have it - I'll
> > pull it in via my block-next branch.
> >
>
> Rather than keep this on my email queue:
>
> Applied to my block-next branch:
>
> git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc
On Mon, 11/13 17:41, John Snow wrote:
> Jeff, I think this ought to go through your tree, but I'll sign off on it.
>
> Fam: Do you agree?
Sounds good.
Fam
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:00:06AM -0500, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:41:13PM -0500, John Snow wrote:
> > Jeff, I think this ought to go through your tree, but I'll sign off on it.
> >
> > Fam: Do you agree?
> >
> > (Probably -next material, but I'm sending this email because
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:41:13PM -0500, John Snow wrote:
> Jeff, I think this ought to go through your tree, but I'll sign off on it.
>
> Fam: Do you agree?
>
> (Probably -next material, but I'm sending this email because I'm taking
> it out of my review queue and I don't want it to get lost.)
Jeff, I think this ought to go through your tree, but I'll sign off on it.
Fam: Do you agree?
(Probably -next material, but I'm sending this email because I'm taking
it out of my review queue and I don't want it to get lost.)
--js
On 10/12/2017 09:53 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>
On 10/12/2017 09:53 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi all. Here is a continuation of my "new backup architecture" series,
> The very first part, but it is meaningful itself.
>
> v2: rebase on master
> 01: add test and fix bug
Nice, glad you caught it.
Reviewed-by: John Snow
Hi all. Here is a continuation of my "new backup architecture" series,
The very first part, but it is meaningful itself.
v2: rebase on master
01: add test and fix bug
02: move commit about NONE mode to this patch, add John's r-b (hope,
you are OK with this tiny change)
03: tiny refactor
