On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:04:36AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > I don't have bandwidth for non-trivial cosmetic stuff at the
> > moment, sorry.
>
> What's "bandwidth" in this context?
Time. My review queue is 120 patches at the moment. I'm tackling those
which are blocked on me and which
On 03/19/2012 03:04 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 19.03.2012 18:36, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:19:03AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/15/2012 04:00 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
This patch combines two functions into one, and replaces
the implementation with already ex
On 19.03.2012 18:36, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:19:03AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 03/15/2012 04:00 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> This patch combines two functions into one, and replaces
>>> the implementation with already existing iov_memset() from
>>> iov.c.
>>>
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:19:03AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/15/2012 04:00 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >This patch combines two functions into one, and replaces
> >the implementation with already existing iov_memset() from
> >iov.c.
> >
> >The new prototype of qemu_iovec_memset():
> >
On 03/15/2012 04:00 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
This patch combines two functions into one, and replaces
the implementation with already existing iov_memset() from
iov.c.
The new prototype of qemu_iovec_memset():
size_t qemu_iovec_memset(qiov, size_t offset, int fillc, size_t bytes)
It is diff
This patch combines two functions into one, and replaces
the implementation with already existing iov_memset() from
iov.c.
The new prototype of qemu_iovec_memset():
size_t qemu_iovec_memset(qiov, size_t offset, int fillc, size_t bytes)
It is different from former qemu_iovec_memset_skip(), and
I