On 3 June 2015 at 15:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-06-03 09:09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On 2015-06-02 19:01, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> > I like using the BIT() macro for this kind of thing.
>>
>> Thanks for the hint, I'll come with an additional patch to fix that in
>> the code.
>
> U
On 2015-06-03 09:09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-06-02 19:01, Christopher Covington wrote:
> > Hi Aurelien,
> >
> > On 06/01/2015 05:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Use the bit number for SR constants instead of using a bit mask. This
> > > make possible to also use the constants for shifts
On 2015-06-02 19:01, Christopher Covington wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On 06/01/2015 05:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Use the bit number for SR constants instead of using a bit mask. This
> > make possible to also use the constants for shifts.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
> > Signed-o
Hi Aurelien,
On 06/01/2015 05:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Use the bit number for SR constants instead of using a bit mask. This
> make possible to also use the constants for shifts.
>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
> Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno
> ---
> target-sh4/cpu.c | 3 +-
>
Use the bit number for SR constants instead of using a bit mask. This
make possible to also use the constants for shifts.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno
---
target-sh4/cpu.c | 3 +-
target-sh4/cpu.h | 30 ++--
target-sh4/gdbstub.c |
