Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-12-02 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 16:06 -0600, Brian Jackson wrote: > On Monday, November 29, 2010 11:42:49 am Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd > > like to get us back onto a predictable schedule. > > > > Here's what I propose: > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-12-02 Thread Brian Jackson
On Monday, November 29, 2010 11:42:49 am Anthony Liguori wrote: > Hi, > > 0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd > like to get us back onto a predictable schedule. > > Here's what I propose: > > 12/6 - fork off stable-0.14 tree; simultaneously release qemu-0.14.0-r

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-12-02 Thread Randy Smith
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 29.11.2010 18:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > > 0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd > > like to get us back onto a predictable schedule. > > Telling people six days in advance when the fork will be is hardly > predictab

[Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan (v2)

2010-12-02 Thread Anthony Liguori
Here's a slightly modified schedule to allow some outstanding bits on the block tree to be merged before release. 12/17 - release qemu-0.14.0-rc0, for stable-0.14 12/27 - release qemu-0.14.0-rc1 1/3 - release qemu-0.14.0-rc2 1/5 - release qemu-0.14.0 based on -rc2 with just versioning changes

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-12-01 Thread Luiz Capitulino
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:49:24 +0100 Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 30.11.2010 15:12, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > > On 11/30/2010 04:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > >> Am 29.11.2010 18:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > >> > >>> 0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd > >>> like to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-12-01 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 29.11.2010 18:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > 0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd > like to get us back onto a predictable schedule. Telling people six days in advance when the fork will be is hardly predictable. :-) For example, in the block area there are cu

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-12-01 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 11/30/2010 04:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 29.11.2010 18:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori: 0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd like to get us back onto a predictable schedule. Telling people six days in advance when the fork will be is hardly predictable

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-12-01 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 30.11.2010 15:12, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 11/30/2010 04:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Am 29.11.2010 18:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> >>> 0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd >>> like to get us back onto a predictable schedule. >>> >> Telling peopl

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-11-29 Thread Justin M. Forbes
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 14:14 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 11/29/2010 01:58 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 29.11.2010, at 20:29, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > > > >> Is 2 just right? > >> > > I was thinking of a more sophisticated model. Maybe 1 maintainer + 1 user? > > Or 1 person

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-11-29 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 11/29/2010 01:58 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 29.11.2010, at 20:29, Anthony Liguori wrote: Is 2 just right? I was thinking of a more sophisticated model. Maybe 1 maintainer + 1 user? Or 1 person who knows his way around the area + 1 more? + 1 user? cute :-) 2 Acks seems l

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-11-29 Thread Alexander Graf
On 29.11.2010, at 20:29, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 11/29/2010 12:10 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 29.11.2010, at 18:42, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> 0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd like >>> to get us back onto a predictable schedule.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-11-29 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 11/29/2010 12:10 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 29.11.2010, at 18:42, Anthony Liguori wrote: Hi, 0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd like to get us back onto a predictable schedule. Here's what I propose: 12/6 - fork off stable-0.14 tree; simultaneousl

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-11-29 Thread Alexander Graf
On 29.11.2010, at 18:42, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Hi, > > 0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd like to > get us back onto a predictable schedule. > > Here's what I propose: > > 12/6 - fork off stable-0.14 tree; simultaneously release qemu-0.14.0-rc0 > > For t

[Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan

2010-11-29 Thread Anthony Liguori
Hi, 0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd like to get us back onto a predictable schedule. Here's what I propose: 12/6 - fork off stable-0.14 tree; simultaneously release qemu-0.14.0-rc0 For the stable-0.14 tree, I'd like to have Justin be in charge of collec