> On 23 Apr 2015, at 14:55, Leon Alrae wrote:
>
> have been broken into 3 separate patches:
please feel free to reorganise the patches as you think it is more appropriate.
to avoid conflicts in my branch I would obviously appreciate keeping the
structure as is, and also keeping the cmdline as
On 21/04/2015 19:08, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>> On 21 Apr 2015, at 16:34, Leon Alrae wrote:
>>
>> I'll resend the patch with dropped "RFC" as I would really like to go
>> forward and finally close this issue.
>
> perhaps you should first take a closer look at the patch I submitted, since
> it co
> On 21 Apr 2015, at 16:34, Leon Alrae wrote:
>
> I'll resend the patch with dropped "RFC" as I would really like to go
> forward and finally close this issue.
perhaps you should first take a closer look at the patch I submitted, since it
covers not only parsing the arguments, but also groupin
On 21 April 2015 at 17:51, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
> could you also suggest a solution for a .BAT script when running on windows?
I don't do windows, so you're on your own there, I'm afraid,
though a little googling suggests windows bat syntax does
have sufficient power (eg string-replacement functi
> On 21 Apr 2015, at 19:54, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> Incidentally if you have a better idea for achieving the
> desired goal than this messing around with comma-escaping
> I would really like to know. I don't like either of the
> current two proposals very much :-(
please keep in mind that the
On 04/21/2015 10:54 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 21 April 2015 at 17:48, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 04/21/2015 09:55 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> If you want pure POSIX shell then it is slightly
>>> uglier as we have to invoke sed:
>>>
>>> argstr=""
>>> for arg in "$@"; do
>>> o=$(printf '%s.\n
On 21 April 2015 at 17:48, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/21/2015 09:55 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> If you want pure POSIX shell then it is slightly
>> uglier as we have to invoke sed:
>>
>> argstr=""
>> for arg in "$@"; do
>> o=$(printf '%s.\n' "$arg" | sed s/,/,,/g)
>> argstr=${argstr:+$arg
> On 21 Apr 2015, at 19:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
>> do these scripts properly handle args containing spaces or embedded
>> apostrophes/quotes?
>
> Yes. Also arguments containing newlines.
super!
could you also suggest a solution for a .BAT script when running on windows?
in my opinion bot
On 04/21/2015 09:55 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> If you want pure POSIX shell then it is slightly
> uglier as we have to invoke sed:
>
> argstr=""
> for arg in "$@"; do
> o=$(printf '%s.\n' "$arg" | sed s/,/,,/g)
> argstr=${argstr:+$argstr,}arg=${o%.}
> done
It's possible to use IFS= and
On 21 April 2015 at 17:21, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>> On 21 Apr 2015, at 18:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> On 21 April 2015 at 16:14, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>>> if you insist on the arg= solution, could you be so kind and
>>> provide a bash script wrapper that passes all arguments ($@)
>>> using yo
> On 21 Apr 2015, at 18:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On 21 April 2015 at 16:14, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>> if you insist on the arg= solution, could you be so kind and
>> provide a bash script wrapper that passes all arguments ($@)
>> using your syntax?
>
>
> ... bashisms ... pure POSIX shell
d
On 21 April 2015 at 16:14, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
> if you insist on the arg= solution, could you be so kind and
> provide a bash script wrapper that passes all arguments ($@)
> using your syntax?
If you're willing to accept bashisms, then:
argstr=""
for arg in "$@"; do
argstr=${argstr:+$args
> On 21 Apr 2015, at 16:34, Leon Alrae wrote:
>
> (PS: --semihosting-cmdline $@ is probably the most convenient from GUI /
> wrapper point of view, but I don't have an opinion whether this is
> enough to justify adding a top level QEMU command line option with such
> a unique syntax)
nope, the
On 16/04/2015 15:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 April 2015 at 10:09, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>> we currently have two solutions:
>>
>> - multiple: --semihosting-config arg="..."
>> - a single option, placed at the end, and followed by any number
>> of arguments: --semihosting-cmdline $@ \n
>>
>>
> On 16 Apr 2015, at 12:27, Leon Alrae wrote:
>
> ... I believe it would be much easier if you sent the patches first
I just did this.
> On 16 Apr 2015, at 17:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
> it is nothing like
> the way QEMU's system-emulator mode handles other command line
> arguments.
generall
On 15 April 2015 at 10:09, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
> we currently have two solutions:
>
> - multiple: --semihosting-config arg="..."
> - a single option, placed at the end, and followed by any number
> of arguments: --semihosting-cmdline $@ \n
>
> both can generate the array of args required by UHI
On 15/04/2015 17:08, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>> On 15 Apr 2015, at 15:49, Leon Alrae wrote:
>>
>> ... If there aren't any objections for the proposed solution, then let's
>> just cook up the patch.
>
> the changes related to moving --semihosting-cmdline to the end of the line
> are in:
>
> gi
> On 15 Apr 2015, at 15:49, Leon Alrae wrote:
>
> ... If there aren't any objections for the proposed solution, then let's
> just cook up the patch.
the changes related to moving --semihosting-cmdline to the end of the line are
in:
git://git.code.sf.net/p/gnuarmeclipse/qemu gnuarmeclipse-qe
On 15/04/2015 13:06, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>> On 15 Apr 2015, at 14:53, Leon Alrae wrote:
>>
>> On 15/04/2015 10:09, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>>> Peter/Leon,
>>>
>>> I'm planning for my future releases, and, to avoid incompatible versions, I
>>> would like to help with the semihosting configuration
> On 15 Apr 2015, at 14:53, Leon Alrae wrote:
>
> On 15/04/2015 10:09, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>> Peter/Leon,
>>
>> I'm planning for my future releases, and, to avoid incompatible versions, I
>> would like to help with the semihosting configuration issue, to speed up
>> things. is there any chan
Leon Alrae writes:
> On 15/04/2015 10:09, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
> > Peter/Leon,
> >
> > I'm planning for my future releases, and, to avoid incompatible
> versions, I would like to help with the semihosting configuration issue,
> to speed up things. is there any chance to close this issue in the nea
On 15/04/2015 10:09, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
> Peter/Leon,
>
> I'm planning for my future releases, and, to avoid incompatible versions, I
> would like to help with the semihosting configuration issue, to speed up
> things. is there any chance to close this issue in the near future?
I'm hoping so
Peter/Leon,
I'm planning for my future releases, and, to avoid incompatible versions, I
would like to help with the semihosting configuration issue, to speed up
things. is there any chance to close this issue in the near future?
we currently have two solutions:
- multiple: --semihosting-config
> On 08 Apr 2015, at 19:20, Leon Alrae wrote:
>
> ... I do understand
> however that in your particular case cmdline is more convenient, thus I
> personally don’t mind having both options: the user-friendly cmdline and
> more flexible arg.
I was a bit optimistic with the first implementation of
On 02/04/2015 17:47, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>> On 02 Apr 2015, at 17:27, Matthew Fortune wrote:
>>
>> Liviu Ionescu writes:
>>> for completeness:
>>>
>>> ilg-mbp:gnuarmeclipse-qemu.git ilg$ "/Applications/GNU ARM
>>> Eclipse/QEMU/2.2.91-20150402-dev/bin/qemu-system-gnuarmeclipse" -
>>> verbo
> On 01 Apr 2015, at 16:18, Leon Alrae wrote:
>
> ... I would like to follow up with a clean up
> where we've got a semi-hosting specific structure rather than keep generating
> more semihosting_* variables.
I checked the differences between my fork and the master branch (SourceTree for
Mac is
> On 02 Apr 2015, at 17:27, Matthew Fortune wrote:
>
> Liviu Ionescu writes:
>> for completeness:
>>
>> ilg-mbp:gnuarmeclipse-qemu.git ilg$ "/Applications/GNU ARM
>> Eclipse/QEMU/2.2.91-20150402-dev/bin/qemu-system-gnuarmeclipse" -
>> verbose -machine STM32-H103 -gdb tcp::1234 -semihosting
Liviu Ionescu writes:
> > On 02 Apr 2015, at 13:36, Leon Alrae wrote:
> >
> >> How would you pass arguments containing whitespaces via
> >> -semihosting-config cmdline without having to reinvent shell within
> QEMU?
> >
> > I missed the fact that you already provided the implementation for
> > th
> On 02 Apr 2015, at 13:36, Leon Alrae wrote:
>
>> How would you pass arguments containing whitespaces via
>> -semihosting-config cmdline without having to reinvent shell within QEMU?
>
> I missed the fact that you already provided the implementation for this
> below...
for completeness:
ilg
On 02/04/2015 10:14, Leon Alrae wrote:
> On 02/04/2015 09:29, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>>
>>> On 02 Apr 2015, at 10:56, Leon Alrae wrote:
>>>
>>> ... The UHI semihosting supports Argn syscall which returns single argument,
>>> and Argn is called multiple times to build argv (each argument can
>>> cont
On 02/04/2015 09:29, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>> On 02 Apr 2015, at 10:56, Leon Alrae wrote:
>>
>> ... The UHI semihosting supports Argn syscall which returns single argument,
>> and Argn is called multiple times to build argv (each argument can
>> contain whitespaces).
>
> ok, I don't want to com
> On 02 Apr 2015, at 10:56, Leon Alrae wrote:
>
> ... The UHI semihosting supports Argn syscall which returns single argument,
> and Argn is called multiple times to build argv (each argument can
> contain whitespaces).
ok, I don't want to comment too much on UHI design, since I'm not familiar
On 01/04/2015 16:21, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>
>> On 01 Apr 2015, at 16:18, Leon Alrae wrote:
>>
>> ... This simple patch adds "arg" sub-argument which in my opinion is flexible
>> enough to satisfy semi-hosting interfaces which allocate buffers at runtime
>> (so it is possible to pass any number of
> On 01 Apr 2015, at 18:45, Christopher Covington wrote:
>
> I think the commit message and help text should include some information on
> how this is different from -append and what the result is of specifying both
> -append foo=a and -semihosting-config arg=foo=b.
if I remember right (did not
Liviu Ionescu writes:
> > On 01 Apr 2015, at 16:18, Leon Alrae wrote:
> >
> > ... This simple patch adds "arg" sub-argument which in my opinion is
> > flexible enough to satisfy semi-hosting interfaces which allocate
> > buffers at runtime (so it is possible to pass any number of strings of
> > a
Hi Leon,
On 04/01/2015 09:18 AM, Leon Alrae wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Leon Alrae
> ---
> Hi,
>
> Continuing the discussion related to extending QEMU's command line with new
> argument allowing to pass semi-hosting input arguments to the guest program:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-deve
> On 01 Apr 2015, at 16:18, Leon Alrae wrote:
>
> ... This simple patch adds "arg" sub-argument which in my opinion is flexible
> enough to satisfy semi-hosting interfaces which allocate buffers at runtime
> (so it is possible to pass any number of strings of any length) as well as the
> ones wh
Signed-off-by: Leon Alrae
---
Hi,
Continuing the discussion related to extending QEMU's command line with new
argument allowing to pass semi-hosting input arguments to the guest program:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-03/msg05960.html
This simple patch adds "arg" sub-argument
38 matches
Mail list logo
