On 4/11/19 4:05 PM, Jan Bobek wrote:
> Looks fine to me. I suppose if I had written it, I would have included
> more comments and/or #define's to make some bits more obvious (all the
> magic constants look a bit scary until you read the Intel manual), but
> nevermind that.
You're right that it
Looks fine to me. I suppose if I had written it, I would have included
more comments and/or #define's to make some bits more obvious (all the
magic constants look a bit scary until you read the Intel manual), but
nevermind that.
I guess the other remaining part now is extending risugen to
The state expected for a given test must be specifically requested
with the --xfeatures=mask command-line argument. This is recorded
with the saved state so that it is obvious if the apprentice is given
a different argument. Any features beyond what are present on the
running cpu will read as
