I just realized what we need in order to test QEMU better. We need a list of
people who
are willing to support a certain operating system.
The list would probably be located here: http://wiki.qemu.org/Testing/Windows
It would look like this:
Operating systemTester
Windows 3.1
Dennis-Jordan , ehabk...@redhat.com,
> "qemu-devel@nongnu.org qemu-devel" ,
> Programmingkid , Richard Henderson
> , "MichaelS. Tsirkin"
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Commit
> 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84 breaks Windows
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 03:04:59PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> We're unlikely to be deleting machine types (and the features they
> depend on) for as long as there's downstream vendors who need compat
> with that vintage of features.
.. and actually put in the manpower to maintain them :)
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 03:43:43PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:33:37 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > On 26/07/2017 15:30, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:10:40 +0200
> > > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 26/07/2017 15:08, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 03:30:20PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:10:40 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > On 26/07/2017 15:08, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:23:22 +0200
> > > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 25/07/2017 18:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:33:37 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/07/2017 15:30, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:10:40 +0200
> > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >> On 26/07/2017 15:08, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:23:22 +0200
> >>> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>>
On 26/07/2017 15:30, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:10:40 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> On 26/07/2017 15:08, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:23:22 +0200
>>> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
On 25/07/2017 18:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> "No regressions beca
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:10:40 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/07/2017 15:08, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:23:22 +0200
> > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >> On 25/07/2017 18:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >>> "No regressions became apparent in tests with a range of Windows
> >>
On 26/07/2017 15:08, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:23:22 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> On 25/07/2017 18:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> "No regressions became apparent in tests with a range of Windows
>>>(XP-10)"
>>>
>>> In theory, w2k falls within that range.
>>
>> Nope,
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:23:22 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/07/2017 18:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > "No regressions became apparent in tests with a range of Windows
> >(XP-10)"
> >
> > In theory, w2k falls within that range.
>
> Nope, Windows 2000 is like NT 5.0, XP is like NT 5.1. :
On 26/07/2017 13:42, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Not exactly; the PCD controls whether the EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL will
> expose an RSDT, an XSDT, or both (with matching contents).
You're right that the code does not produce a v1 FADT, I mis-skimmed the
awful code of AcpiTableDxe. Though the intentions
Digressing:
On 07/26/17 10:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/07/2017 23:25, Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
>> Thanks for this, Paolo. Very interesting idea.
>>
>> I couldn't get things working initially, but with a few fixups on the
>> SeaBIOS side I can boot both legacy and modern OSes. See comments
>>
On 25/07/2017 23:25, Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
> Thanks for this, Paolo. Very interesting idea.
>
> I couldn't get things working initially, but with a few fixups on the
> SeaBIOS side I can boot both legacy and modern OSes. See comments
> inline below for details on changes required.
>
> Success
Thanks for this, Paolo. Very interesting idea.
I couldn't get things working initially, but with a few fixups on the
SeaBIOS side I can boot both legacy and modern OSes. See comments
inline below for details on changes required.
Successfully booted (only a brief test):
- Windows 2000
- Windows XP
On 25/07/2017 18:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/07/2017 18:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> "No regressions became apparent in tests with a range of Windows
>>(XP-10)"
>>
>> In theory, w2k falls within that range.
>
> Nope, Windows 2000 is like NT 5.0, XP is like NT 5.1. :(
>
> One possibility
On 25/07/2017 18:14, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> "No regressions became apparent in tests with a range of Windows
>(XP-10)"
>
> In theory, w2k falls within that range.
Nope, Windows 2000 is like NT 5.0, XP is like NT 5.1. :(
One possibility is to fix it in SeaBIOS instead: if you get a 2.0 FADT
On 07/21/17 20:29, Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:23:38 +0100
>> "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:06:36AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:29:33 +0200
Phil Dennis-
> On Jul 24, 2017, at 12:43 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
>
>
> On 07/21/2017 05:06 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:29:33 +0200
>> Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
>>> wrote:
I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU re
On 07/21/2017 05:06 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:29:33 +0200
Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
wrote:
I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU recently. After bisecting
the issue I found the offending commit:
w2k is v
Hi,
> > 2. Select FADT version with an option. This one is definitely safe,
> > but adds yet another option.
>
> the 3rd simpler option is:
> force rev1 on old machine types (2.9 and older),
> using machine compat machinery and use rev3 on newer machines
How about keeping rev1 for pc machi
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:23:38 +0100
> "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:06:36AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> > On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:29:33 +0200
>> > Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:50 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
I don't know if this helps but I've found that this same commit also broke
booting OS X on q35 with OVMF and Clover (some old versions I had and worked
before this commit). See here:
http://li
> On Jul 21, 2017, at 5:29 AM, qemu-devel-requ...@nongnu.org wrote:
>
> From: Igor Mammedov
>
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:29:33 +0200
> Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
>> wrote:
>>> I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU recently. Aft
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:23:38 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:06:36AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:29:33 +0200
> > Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
> > > wrote:
> > > > I noticed that
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:50 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:20:26 +0100
>> "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 09:29:33PM +0200, Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Progra
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:20:26 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 09:29:33PM +0200, Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
wrote:
I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU recently. A
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:20:26 +0100
> "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 09:29:33PM +0200, Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
>> > wrote:
>> > > I noticed that Windows 2000 d
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:20:26 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 09:29:33PM +0200, Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
> > wrote:
> > > I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU recently. After
> > > bisecting the is
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:06:36AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:29:33 +0200
> Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
> > wrote:
> > > I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU recently. After
> > > bisecting the issue I
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 09:29:33PM +0200, Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
> wrote:
> > I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU recently. After
> > bisecting the issue I found the offending commit:
>
> Ouch. I reckon we have 2 options for f
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:29:33 +0200
> Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
>> wrote:
>> > I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU recently. After
>> > bisecting the issue I found the o
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:29:33 +0200
Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
> wrote:
> > I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU recently. After
> > bisecting the issue I found the offending commit:
w2k is very ancient (and long time EOLed), I can
> On Jul 20, 2017, at 3:29 PM, Phil Dennis-Jordan wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
> wrote:
>> I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU recently. After
>> bisecting the issue I found the offending commit:
>
> Ouch. I reckon we have 2 options for fixing th
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Programmingkid
wrote:
> I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU recently. After
> bisecting the issue I found the offending commit:
Ouch. I reckon we have 2 options for fixing this:
1. Export two FADTs, one ACPI 1.0, one ACPI 2.0. The latter would n
I noticed that Windows 2000 does not boot up in QEMU recently. After bisecting
the issue I found the offending commit:
commit 77af8a2b95b79699de650965d5228772743efe84
Author: Phil Dennis-Jordan
Date: Wed Mar 15 19:20:26 2017 +1300
hw/i386: Use Rev3 FADT (ACPI 2.0) instead of Rev1 to impro
35 matches
Mail list logo
