Re: [Qemu-devel] Documentation bug in QEMU/KQEMU

2007-03-21 Thread Jernej Simonèiè
On Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 7:13:16, James Jacobs wrote: Suggested fix: support Win98SE. Is there a good technical reason why it can't be supported? System obsolescence? Completely different kernel driver model compared to NT? * Also, \\.\kqemu is not a legal pathname under any version of

Re: [Qemu-devel] Documentation bug in QEMU/KQEMU

2007-03-21 Thread Philip Boulain
On 21 Mar 2007, at 06:13, James Jacobs wrote: It is not mentioned that KQEMU is incompatible with Win98SE. It is also not mentioned that it is incompatible with Linux 0.1. However, if you make a closed world assumption (things which are not stated to be true are false), this is easy to

[Qemu-devel] Documentation bug in QEMU/KQEMU

2007-03-20 Thread James Jacobs
It is not mentioned that KQEMU is incompatible with Win98SE. Suggested fix: support Win98SE. Is there a good technical reason why it can't be supported? Temporary workaround: clearly state on the webpage and in documentation that KQEMU is not compatible with Win9x. (This has wasted a considerable