On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Erik Rull wrote:
>>> which is the graphics emulation with the lowest CPU usage for 2D-only
>>> GUIs?
>>> (e.g. Win XP without Direct3D usage)? I just need to drive a virtual
>>> graphics display with 1024x768 (@16bit colors). At the moment I use the
>>> cirrus gra
Hi,
thanks for your quick reply.
Dunrong Huang wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Erik Rull wrote:
Hi all,
which is the graphics emulation with the lowest CPU usage for 2D-only GUIs?
(e.g. Win XP without Direct3D usage)? I just need to drive a virtual
graphics display with 1024x768 (@16
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Erik Rull wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> which is the graphics emulation with the lowest CPU usage for 2D-only GUIs?
> (e.g. Win XP without Direct3D usage)? I just need to drive a virtual
> graphics display with 1024x768 (@16bit colors). At the moment I use the
> cirrus grap
Hi all,
which is the graphics emulation with the lowest CPU usage for 2D-only GUIs?
(e.g. Win XP without Direct3D usage)? I just need to drive a virtual
graphics display with 1024x768 (@16bit colors). At the moment I use the
cirrus graphics card emulation. Is there something more efficient?
T
