On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Cao,Bing Bu wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 09:12 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/03/2012 10:33 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 01:09:40PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
>>>
On 01/03/2012 09:12 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 01/03/2012 10:33 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 01:09:40PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Status of virtio d
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 13:12 +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
> > On 01/03/2012 10:33 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 01:09:40PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in
On 3 January 2012 14:02, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 07:57 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> The CPU should always be a child of the board, surely, even if the user
>> might want to use a different one? That's just basic composition.
>> The links should be for "the CPU has two input IRQ lines
Am 03.01.2012 14:12, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
>> There is a legal issue w/ WHQL drivers but self sign is not a probably and I
>> believe that's what we have today.
>
> For a user anything other than first-class native drivers is a red
> flag that
On 01/03/2012 07:57 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 3 January 2012 13:37, Anthony Liguori wrote:
For what you're getting at, you actually want to model the CPUs in QOM such
that you would have an ARM926 is-a ARMCPU is-a CPUCommon.
Then you could have the beagle machine have a link. If it always
h
On 01/03/2012 07:52 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Anthony,
Am 03.01.2012 02:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 01/02/2012 07:46 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 02.01.2012 13:09, schrieb Juan Quintela:
First of all, Happy New Year to everybody (even for the people whose
calendar is different O:-)
+1
On 3 January 2012 13:37, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> For what you're getting at, you actually want to model the CPUs in QOM such
> that you would have an ARM926 is-a ARMCPU is-a CPUCommon.
>
> Then you could have the beagle machine have a link. If it always
> has a single CPU, you make it a child an
Anthony,
Am 03.01.2012 02:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 01/02/2012 07:46 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 02.01.2012 13:09, schrieb Juan Quintela:
>>> First of all, Happy New Year to everybody (even for the people whose
>>> calendar is different O:-)
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> Please send in any agenda it
On 01/03/2012 04:26 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 3 January 2012 01:14, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Let's separate out what a user *should* do from what a user *can* do.
A user *should* have a command line syntax that reflects something that
makes sense to them. For instance, qemu-system-arm --machi
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 10:33 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 01:09:40PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>>
>> Status of virtio drivers for Windows:
>> * Unsupp
On 01/03/2012 10:33 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 01:09:40PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Status of virtio drivers for Windows:
* Unsupported in community today
Why?
* Bugs languish on bug tracker/maili
On 3 January 2012 10:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
> I don't think we even have syntax for 2 at the moment except for the
> weird special case of "-cpu foo".
It currently is quite common to e.g. use a versatilepb machine model
but switch the CPU for arm1176, cortex-a8 etc with -cpu. Will this
still be
On 3 January 2012 01:14, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Let's separate out what a user *should* do from what a user *can* do.
>
> A user *should* have a command line syntax that reflects something that
> makes sense to them. For instance, qemu-system-arm --machine beaglebone
>
> I don't really care wha
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 01:09:40PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Status of virtio drivers for Windows:
* Unsupported in community today
* Bugs languish on bug tracker/mailing list
* Risking a reputation of not supporting Windows gu
On 01/03/2012 02:12 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
2/4 is on the list. It's adding the type infrastructure such that when
you do -device e1000, as far as QOM is concerned you're creating an
E1000 object which inherits from a PCIDevice, etc.
Yes, sorry, that was quite obvious. I was not sure about
On 01/02/2012 09:54 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 2 January 2012 13:46, Andreas Färber wrote:
* when can we expect to be able to model SoCs rather than CPUs? Will
this affect command line usage - are we going to have '-device
ti-tms570' rather than '-cpu cortex-r4' then, or -cpu overriding the
co
On 01/02/2012 08:11 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/02/2012 02:46 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
QOM: If Anthony is available, I'd be interested in hearing an update on
the roadmap. In particular,
* when can we expect to be able to model SoCs rather than CPUs? Will
this affect command line usage - are
On 01/02/2012 07:46 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 02.01.2012 13:09, schrieb Juan Quintela:
First of all, Happy New Year to everybody (even for the people whose
calendar is different O:-)
+1
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
QOM: If Anthony is available, I'd be
On 2 January 2012 13:46, Andreas Färber wrote:
> * when can we expect to be able to model SoCs rather than CPUs? Will
> this affect command line usage - are we going to have '-device
> ti-tms570' rather than '-cpu cortex-r4' then, or -cpu overriding the
> container's default?
My initial inclinati
On 01/02/2012 02:46 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
QOM: If Anthony is available, I'd be interested in hearing an update on
the roadmap. In particular,
* when can we expect to be able to model SoCs rather than CPUs? Will
this affect command line usage - are we going to have '-device
ti-tms570' rather t
Am 02.01.2012 13:09, schrieb Juan Quintela:
> First of all, Happy New Year to everybody (even for the people whose
> calendar is different O:-)
+1
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
QOM: If Anthony is available, I'd be interested in hearing an update on
the roadmap
Hi
First of all, Happy New Year to everybody (even for the people whose
calendar is different O:-)
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Thanks, Juan.
23 matches
Mail list logo
