On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 01:35:06PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Hey, I finally found some time to look into this, the problem that
> > I see is that the PCI carrier doesn't just map each space into its
> > local address spaces, in addition to that:
> >
> > 1) it changes the data and addresses a
On 10/10/2012 12:24 PM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Luckily the low-order bits are used for offsets, and the high-order
>> bits are used for selecting the sub-device.
>>
>> So you could easily have
>>
>> struct IPackDevice {
>> D
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Luckily the low-order bits are used for offsets, and the high-order
> bits are used for selecting the sub-device.
>
> So you could easily have
>
> struct IPackDevice {
> DeviceState qdev;
> int32_t slot;
> /* IRQ objec
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 12:19:07PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > So you could easily have
> >
> > struct IPackDevice {
> > DeviceState qdev;
> > int32_t slot;
> > /* IRQ objects for the IndustryPack INT0# and INT1# */
> > qemu_irq *irq;
> > MemoryRegion io_space;
> >
On 10/07/2012 12:13 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/05/2012 06:24 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> I'd suppose addressing devices in the bus could be implemented more
>> efficiently with better use of memory API, now some of it is
>> reimplemented. Maybe Avi can propose something?
>
> Luckily the low-or
On 10/05/2012 06:24 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
> I'd suppose addressing devices in the bus could be implemented more
> efficiently with better use of memory API, now some of it is
> reimplemented. Maybe Avi can propose something?
Luckily the low-order bits are used for offsets, and the high-order bi
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:24:08PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Endianness looks buggy, there's no way to turn off big endian mode
I double checked the documentation and I think you're right, I can
update the patch. Thanks for pointing it out.
> DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN should probably be DEVICE_LITTL
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 05/10/2012 15:20, Alberto Garcia ha scritto:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:09:11PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>
Ping
>>>
>>> We are currently in Hard Freeze, new devices will not get accepted
>>> before the release, and our review m
Am 05.10.2012 15:20, schrieb Alberto Garcia:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:09:11PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
>>> Ping
>>
>> We are currently in Hard Freeze, new devices will not get accepted
>> before the release, and our review may focus on bug fixes.
>>
>> http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.2
>
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 05/10/2012 15:20, Alberto Garcia ha scritto:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:09:11PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>
Ping
>>>
>>> We are currently in Hard Freeze, new devices will not get accepted
>>> before the release, and our review may focus on bug fixes.
>>>
>>
Il 05/10/2012 15:20, Alberto Garcia ha scritto:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:09:11PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
>>> Ping
>>
>> We are currently in Hard Freeze, new devices will not get accepted
>> before the release, and our review may focus on bug fixes.
>>
>> http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:09:11PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Ping
>
> We are currently in Hard Freeze, new devices will not get accepted
> before the release, and our review may focus on bug fixes.
>
> http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.2
>
> I remember having had a brief look through your
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:09:11PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> We are currently in Hard Freeze, new devices will not get accepted
> before the release, and our review may focus on bug fixes.
QEMU 1.2 has been released, so here's the new ping.
Patches here:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1
Hi,
Am 31.08.2012 16:12, schrieb Alberto Garcia:
> Ping
We are currently in Hard Freeze, new devices will not get accepted
before the release, and our review may focus on bug fixes.
http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.2
I remember having had a brief look through your patches and they looked
pretty
Ping
Patches here:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/179657/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/179658/
Description:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-08/msg04173.html
Berto
15 matches
Mail list logo
