19.10.2016 20:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 03:17 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Actually gcc suggests to use icm %r0,15,0(%r8). It's even shorter than
>> lt %r0,0(%r8).
>
> Yep, that works too.
So what's the final patch for this, if any? :)
Or should I just use extra -march?
Thanks
On 10/18/2016 03:17 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Actually gcc suggests to use icm %r0,15,0(%r8). It's even shorter than
lt %r0,0(%r8).
Yep, that works too.
r~
On 2016-10-17 07:35, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 03:55 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > On 10/17/2016 10:26 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > On 14.10.2016 20:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > This commit: c9bc3437a905b660561a26cd4ecc64579843267b
> > > > Author: Ri
On 10/17/2016 03:55 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 10/17/2016 10:26 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 14.10.2016 20:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Hi.
This commit: c9bc3437a905b660561a26cd4ecc64579843267b
Author: Richard Henderson
Date: Tue Jun 21 17:32:12 2016 -0700
linux-user: Provide safe_
On 10/17/2016 10:26 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 14.10.2016 20:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> This commit: c9bc3437a905b660561a26cd4ecc64579843267b
>> Author: Richard Henderson
>> Date: Tue Jun 21 17:32:12 2016 -0700
>>
>> linux-user: Provide safe_syscall for s390x
>>
>> does not bui
17.10.2016 13:49, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 17.10.2016 13:39, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
>> (cc is gcc 6.2.0)
>>
>> I've no idea which -march is the default and what choices are available.
>
> $ gcc -march=?
> gcc: error: unrecognized argument in option '-march=?'
> gcc: note: valid arguments to '-m
17.10.2016 13:53, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 17.10.2016 12:49, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 17.10.2016 13:39, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>
>>> (cc is gcc 6.2.0)
>>>
>>> I've no idea which -march is the default and what choices are available.
>>
>> $ gcc -march=?
>> gcc: error: unrecognized argument in optio
On 17.10.2016 12:49, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 17.10.2016 13:39, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
>> (cc is gcc 6.2.0)
>>
>> I've no idea which -march is the default and what choices are available.
>
> $ gcc -march=?
> gcc: error: unrecognized argument in option '-march=?'
> gcc: note: valid arguments to
17.10.2016 13:39, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> (cc is gcc 6.2.0)
>
> I've no idea which -march is the default and what choices are available.
$ gcc -march=?
gcc: error: unrecognized argument in option '-march=?'
gcc: note: valid arguments to '-march=' are: g5 g6 native z10 z13 z196
z9-109 z9-ec z900
17.10.2016 11:26, Thomas Huth пишет:
> On 14.10.2016 20:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> This commit: c9bc3437a905b660561a26cd4ecc64579843267b
>> Author: Richard Henderson
>> Date: Tue Jun 21 17:32:12 2016 -0700
>>
>> linux-user: Provide safe_syscall for s390x
>>
>> does not build on
On 14.10.2016 20:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This commit: c9bc3437a905b660561a26cd4ecc64579843267b
> Author: Richard Henderson
> Date: Tue Jun 21 17:32:12 2016 -0700
>
> linux-user: Provide safe_syscall for s390x
>
> does not build on debian unstable porterbox for s390x, with
> t
Hi.
This commit: c9bc3437a905b660561a26cd4ecc64579843267b
Author: Richard Henderson
Date: Tue Jun 21 17:32:12 2016 -0700
linux-user: Provide safe_syscall for s390x
does not build on debian unstable porterbox for s390x, with
the following error message:
linux-user/host/s390x/safe-syscall
12 matches
Mail list logo