On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 02:08:03PM -0600, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
The stable tree for 1.0 has now been created and the mailing list
exists. I am curious as to people's thoughts on how we should proceed.
There was discussion of setting up a predictable time table for stable
releases, say
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:39:37AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
FWIW in libguestfs we have such a policy. Every few weeks I evaluate
_all_ commits along the development branch and cherry pick those that
meet this policy back to the stable branch, followed by making a new
stable release.
Am 05.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Justin M. Forbes:
Typically I get a flurry of patches shortly after
a release (and they have already started for 1.0). I have tried to get
a .1 release out in a timely manner, and then it seems patches for
stable become few and far between. In the 0.14 and 0.15
On 12/09/2011 06:55 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Justin M. Forbes:
Typically I get a flurry of patches shortly after
a release (and they have already started for 1.0). I have tried to get
a .1 release out in a timely manner, and then it seems patches for
stable become
On 12/09/2011 06:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:39:37AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
FWIW in libguestfs we have such a policy. Every few weeks I evaluate
_all_ commits along the development branch and cherry pick those that
meet this policy back to the stable
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 13:55 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Justin M. Forbes:
Typically I get a flurry of patches shortly after
a release (and they have already started for 1.0). I have tried to get
a .1 release out in a timely manner, and then it seems patches
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 07:25:39AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/09/2011 06:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:39:37AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
FWIW in libguestfs we have such a policy. Every few weeks I evaluate
_all_ commits along the development
Am 09.12.2011 14:24, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 12/09/2011 06:55 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Justin M. Forbes:
Typically I get a flurry of patches shortly after
a release (and they have already started for 1.0). I have tried to get
a .1 release out in a timely
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Justin M. Forbes jmfor...@linuxtx.org wrote:
The stable tree for 1.0 has now been created and the mailing list
exists.
Where does the stable 1.0 tree live?
Stefan
The stable tree for 1.0 has now been created and the mailing list
exists. I am curious as to people's thoughts on how we should proceed.
There was discussion of setting up a predictable time table for stable
releases, say monthly or bimonthly, though that seems a bit difficult
from past
10 matches
Mail list logo
