On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
> Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
>>
>>> Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>
Am 18.12.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
>
>> ledm
Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
>
>> Andreas Färber wrote:
>>
>>> Am 18.12.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>>
>>>
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
> ledma has 0x20 bytes of registers according
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
> Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 18.12.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
ledma has 0x20 bytes of registers according to OBP, and at least
Solaris9
reads the 5th register which
Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 18.12.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Blue Swirl:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
>>> ledma has 0x20 bytes of registers according to OBP, and at least
>>> Solaris9
>>> reads the 5th register which is beyond what we've mapped. So let's
>>> setup
>>> a flag
Am 18.12.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
ledma has 0x20 bytes of registers according to OBP, and at least
Solaris9
reads the 5th register which is beyond what we've mapped. So let's
setup
a flag (inspired by a previous patch from Blue Sw
Thanks, applied.
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Bob Breuer wrote:
> ledma has 0x20 bytes of registers according to OBP, and at least Solaris9
> reads the 5th register which is beyond what we've mapped. So let's setup
> a flag (inspired by a previous patch from Blue Swirl) to identify ledma
> f
