Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 11/19/2009 11:25 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> But I can't see that need in your particular example. The client asks
>> the server to create a snapshot. The operation fails. The client
>> already knows what the name of the snapshot is, doesn't it? No need to
>> ge
On 11/19/2009 11:25 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
But I can't see that need in your particular example. The client asks
the server to create a snapshot. The operation fails. The client
already knows what the name of the snapshot is, doesn't it? No need to
get it from the error.
Yeah, I just
Paolo Bonzini writes:
>> 2. It falls short of the requirement that clients can reasonably
>> classify errors they don't know.
>
> True. (Though adding a classification mechanism can be done later
> once we have an idea of what errors are there at all).
Yes.
If we think there's a risk screw
2. It falls short of the requirement that clients can reasonably
classify errors they don't know.
True. (Though adding a classification mechanism can be done later once
we have an idea of what errors are there at all).
3. It falls short of the requirement that clients can easily prese
