Am 27.10.2009 15:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> Amit Shah wrote:
>> On (Tue) Oct 27 2009 [09:40:27], Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>
All that said, I'm ok with reverting that patch now till I find some
kind of a solution to this.
>>> Which patch do you want to revert? You're aware tha
On (Tue) Oct 27 2009 [09:04:50], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
>> On (Tue) Oct 27 2009 [09:40:27], Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>
All that said, I'm ok with reverting that patch now till I find some
kind of a solution to this.
>>> Which patch do you want to revert? You're
Amit Shah wrote:
On (Tue) Oct 27 2009 [09:40:27], Kevin Wolf wrote:
All that said, I'm ok with reverting that patch now till I find some
kind of a solution to this.
Which patch do you want to revert? You're aware that the qcow2 patch is
a data corruption fix?
Ah, no. Reverting
On (Tue) Oct 27 2009 [09:40:27], Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >
> > All that said, I'm ok with reverting that patch now till I find some
> > kind of a solution to this.
>
> Which patch do you want to revert? You're aware that the qcow2 patch is
> a data corruption fix?
Ah, no. Reverting my patch that cau
Am 27.10.2009 08:46, schrieb Amit Shah:
> On (Mon) Oct 26 2009 [21:15:57], Jan Kiszka wrote:
> However, with the qcow2 synchronous patch, the monitor prompt doesn't
> come up again -- which shows there is a problem with the way the bhs
> work and also the initial resets.
Then the q
On (Mon) Oct 26 2009 [21:15:57], Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> However, with the qcow2 synchronous patch, the monitor prompt doesn't
> >>> come up again -- which shows there is a problem with the way the bhs
> >>> work and also the initial resets.
> >> Then the qcow2 patch is already in? At least applyin
Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Mon) Oct 26 2009 [08:40:12], Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Amit Shah wrote:
>>> On (Sat) Oct 24 2009 [12:36:54], Jan Kiszka wrote:
Amit Shah wrote:
> The OPENED event gets sent also when qemu resets its state initially.
> The consumers of the event aren't interested in re
On (Mon) Oct 26 2009 [08:40:12], Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Sat) Oct 24 2009 [12:36:54], Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Amit Shah wrote:
> >>> The OPENED event gets sent also when qemu resets its state initially.
> >>> The consumers of the event aren't interested in receiving this event
>
Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Sat) Oct 24 2009 [12:36:54], Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Amit Shah wrote:
>>> The OPENED event gets sent also when qemu resets its state initially.
>>> The consumers of the event aren't interested in receiving this event
>>> on reset.
>> The monitor was. Now its initial prompt on ac
On (Sat) Oct 24 2009 [12:36:54], Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > The OPENED event gets sent also when qemu resets its state initially.
> > The consumers of the event aren't interested in receiving this event
> > on reset.
>
> The monitor was. Now its initial prompt on activation is broken
Amit Shah wrote:
> The OPENED event gets sent also when qemu resets its state initially.
> The consumers of the event aren't interested in receiving this event
> on reset.
The monitor was. Now its initial prompt on activation is broken.
Does this patch fix/improve something for a different user?
11 matches
Mail list logo