The main limiting factor is a volunteer to do the work. You can always do
an unofficial bugfix-only release and get it blessed later. (That's how
the Windows and MacOS X binary releases seem to work.)
I would like to volunteer me to maintain a stable branch (and
eventually a bug track) . In
Hi Lauro Ramos Venancio !
I would like to volunteer me to maintain a stable branch (and eventually a bug
track) .
In 2008, I will work full time on qemu and I will need a stable version.
I fully support the idea of having stable branch.
Count me in, as your stable-branch BETA-tester :)
Am 07.01.2008 um 21:38 schrieb Julian Seward:
Perhaps a more important question is, is there interest in making
a stable branch, tracking bugs and producing bug-fix-only releases
from the stable branch? As is traditional in (eg) gcc, etc? If not,
I don't think there is much point in having a
On Monday 07 January 2008 14:38:54 Julian Seward wrote:
[discussion about where to host a bugzilla]
Perhaps a more important question is, is there interest in making
a stable branch, tracking bugs and producing bug-fix-only releases
from the stable branch? As is traditional in (eg) gcc,
Hi all,
I would like to be helpful, and join as a BETA tester to the Qemu community.
However, to be effective I need the right tools to successfully accomplish
my mission. One tool that I would really like to have is a Qemu bugzilla.
Would that be possible to add Qemu bugzilla to the main Qemu
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:06:28PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
I would like to be helpful, and join as a BETA tester to the Qemu
community. However, to be effective I need the right tools to
successfully accomplish my mission. One tool that I would really like
to have is a Qemu bugzilla.
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:56:11PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Would that be possible to add Qemu bugzilla to the main Qemu site
(http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/index.html), please ?
While QEMU is officially still in alpha stage ;) I'd agree that an
issue tracking system can be
