Kazu wrote:
Tuesday, May 16, 2006 8:48 PM Lonnie Mendez wrote:
Kazu wrote:
If you set /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq to 1024 and disable cpuspeed
service that is related to SpeedStep/PowerNow! on a host OS, the clock in
guest OS works fine.
I checked it on i686/x86_64 Linux host.
Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:55 PM Christian MICHON wrote:
how can we do the same if the host is winXP ?
Today, on linux guests, 2.4.x kernel boot faster than 2.6.x kernel
inside qemu (unless using clock=pit on 2.6.x). 2 days ago,
when I tried to setup Solaris x86 10 guest inside winXP host, I
gave
On 5/16/06, Kazu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is normal that 2.4 kernel boots faster than 2.6 kernel, isn't it? I don't
know why Solaris x86 10 doesn't work.
solaris works, it's just painfully slow.
lots of time is wasted in ide-probing inside 2.6.x, because of the
way time is measured in the
Kazu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:55 PM Christian MICHON wrote:
how can we do the same if the host is winXP ?
Today, on linux guests, 2.4.x kernel boot faster than 2.6.x kernel
inside qemu (unless using clock=pit on 2.6.x). 2 days ago,
when I tried to setup
Hello,
As I have reported before, it seems that on my host linux system kqemu does
not work with guest win98se.
Is there any benchmark that I could run in the guest, with and without kqemu,
to check if this is so objectively? (Ideally I'd like two benchmarks - 16-bit
and 32-bit code).
--
Try SiSoftware Sandra
I don't think it will test 16-bit code but whatever.
For 16-bit code you can try the Norton Utilities System Information,
not so complete benchmarking but, 16-bit.
Natalia
El 15/05/2006, a las 20:03, Mikhail Ramendik escribió:
Hello,
As I have reported before, it
On Mon, 15 May 2006 20:03:00 +0200, Mikhail Ramendik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
As I have reported before, it seems that on my host linux system kqemu
does
not work with guest win98se.
Is there any benchmark that I could run in the guest, with and without
kqemu,
to check if this
Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
Hello,
As I have reported before, it seems that on my host linux system kqemu does
not work with guest win98se.
Is there any benchmark that I could run in the guest, with and without kqemu,
to check if this is so objectively? (Ideally I'd like two benchmarks - 16-bit
