On 26/05/2016 14:53, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>>> I'm afraid even our recent efforts in
>>> multi-threaded TCG won't change the situation. The problem is that it
>>> would require to translate somehow ARM's exclusive access monitor to x86
>>> model.
>>>
>> The cmpxchg-based variant would work. It d
On 26/05/16 14:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 26/05/2016 12:42, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> I'm afraid even our recent efforts in
>> multi-threaded TCG won't change the situation. The problem is that it
>> would require to translate somehow ARM's exclusive access monitor to x86
>> model.
>>
> The cmp
On 26/05/2016 12:42, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> I'm afraid even our recent efforts in
> multi-threaded TCG won't change the situation. The problem is that it
> would require to translate somehow ARM's exclusive access monitor to x86
> model.
>
The cmpxchg-based variant would work. It doesn't impl
On 25/05/16 15:34, Jeff Epler wrote:
> Hi. Before I take the time to prepare a detailed bug report, I wanted to
> ask whether I'm doing something that is expected to work, or expected not
> to work.
>
> I am a developer of the LinuxCNC, Free and Open Source software for control
> of milling machin
Hi. Before I take the time to prepare a detailed bug report, I wanted to
ask whether I'm doing something that is expected to work, or expected not
to work.
I am a developer of the LinuxCNC, Free and Open Source software for control
of milling machines, lathes, and so forth.
Our software uses an
