On 19/01/2023 13.40, Wang, Wenchao wrote:
Hi, Daniel,
Thanks for your reply. Could you please help to merge below attached patch to
update the status of HAXM in QEMU? Thanks a lot.
I can add the patch to my next pull request.
Thanks for your contribution!
Thomas
--
From
: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé ; Thomas Huth ;
Paolo Bonzini ; qemu-devel
Subject: Re: Announcement of aborting HAXM maintenance
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 03:56:04AM +, Wang, Wenchao wrote:
> Hi, Philippe,
>
> Intel decided to abort the development of HAXM and the maintenance of
> its QEMU par
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 at 10:34, Stefan Weil via wrote:
>
> Am 19.01.23 um 11:12 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 03:56:04AM +, Wang, Wenchao wrote:
> >> Hi, Philippe,
> >>
> >> Intel decided to abort the development of HAXM and the maintenance
> >> of its QEMU part.
Am 19.01.23 um 11:12 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 03:56:04AM +, Wang, Wenchao wrote:
Hi, Philippe,
Intel decided to abort the development of HAXM and the maintenance
of its QEMU part. Should we submit a patch to mark the Guest CPU
Cores (HAXM) status as Orphan and
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 03:56:04AM +, Wang, Wenchao wrote:
> Hi, Philippe,
>
> Intel decided to abort the development of HAXM and the maintenance
> of its QEMU part. Should we submit a patch to mark the Guest CPU
> Cores (HAXM) status as Orphan and remove the maintainers from the
>
Hi, Philippe,
Intel decided to abort the development of HAXM and the maintenance of its QEMU
part. Should we submit a patch to mark the Guest CPU Cores (HAXM) status as
Orphan and remove the maintainers from the corresponding list? Meanwhile,
should the code enabling HAX in QEMU once committed
