On 01/02/12 20:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 06:44:42PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
On 31/01/12 22:43, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/31/2012 11:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/27/2012 06:42 AM, Alexey Korolev wrote:
On 27/01/12 04:12, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:36
On 01/27/2012 06:42 AM, Alexey Korolev wrote:
On 27/01/12 04:12, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:52:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 11:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300,
On 01/31/2012 11:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/27/2012 06:42 AM, Alexey Korolev wrote:
On 27/01/12 04:12, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:52:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 11:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On 01/27/2012 06:42 AM, Alexey Korolev wrote:
On 27/01/12 04:12, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:52:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 11:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300,
On 31/01/12 22:43, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/31/2012 11:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/27/2012 06:42 AM, Alexey Korolev wrote:
On 27/01/12 04:12, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:52:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 11:14
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 06:44:42PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
On 31/01/12 22:43, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/31/2012 11:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/27/2012 06:42 AM, Alexey Korolev wrote:
On 27/01/12 04:12, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
Hi,
In this post
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-12/msg03171.html I've
mentioned about the issues when 64Bit PCI BAR is present and 32bit
address range is selected for it.
The issue affects all recent qemu
On 01/26/2012 05:19 AM, Alexey Korolev wrote:
If you apply the following patch and add to qemu command: --device
ivshmem,size=32,shm=shm
---
diff --git a/hw/ivshmem.c b/hw/ivshmem.c
index 1aa9e3b..71f8c21 100644
--- a/hw/ivshmem.c
+++ b/hw/ivshmem.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static void
On 01/26/2012 11:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
Hi,
In this post
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-12/msg03171.html I've
mentioned about the issues when 64Bit PCI BAR is present and 32bit
address range is
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:51:06PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Please look at HPET lines. HPET is mapped to 0xfed0.
Size of ivshmem is 32MB. During pci enumeration ivshmem will corrupt the
range from 0xfe00 - 0x.
It overlaps HPET memory. When Linux does late_hpet init, it
On 01/26/2012 04:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Let me see if I get this right: during BAR sizing, the guest sets the
BAR to ~1, which means 4GB-32MB - 4GB, which overlaps the HPET. If so,
that's expected behaviour.
Yes BAR sizing temporarily sets the BAR to an invalid value then
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:52:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 11:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
Hi,
In this post
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-12/msg03171.html I've
mentioned about the
On 01/26/2012 04:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:52:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 11:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
Hi,
In this post
On 27/01/12 03:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:52:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 11:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
Hi,
In this post
On 27/01/12 04:12, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:52:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2012 11:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
Hi,
In this post
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
Hi,
In this post
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-12/msg03171.html I've
mentioned about the issues when 64Bit PCI BAR is present and 32bit
address range is selected for it.
The issue affects all recent qemu
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
Hi,
In this post
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-12/msg03171.html I've
mentioned about the issues when 64Bit PCI BAR is present and 32bit
address range is selected for it.
The issue affects all recent qemu
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:38 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
Hi,
In this post
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-12/msg03171.html I've
mentioned about the issues when 64Bit PCI BAR is present and 32bit
Hi Alex and Michael
For testing, I applied the following patch to qemu,
converting msix bar to 64 bit.
Guest did not seem to crash.
I booted Fedora Live CD 32 bit guest on a 32 bit host
to level 3 without crash, and verified that
the BAR is a 64 bit one, and that I got assigned an address
On 26/01/12 01:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:46:03PM +1300, Alexey Korolev wrote:
Hi,
In this post
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-12/msg03171.html I've
mentioned about the issues when 64Bit PCI BAR is present and 32bit
address range is selected
20 matches
Mail list logo
