Hi,
I was pleasantly surprised to find a plethora of options in the latest qemu version 2.0.95. I have spent a couple of hours reading the documentation, and unfortunately was not able to run the program to see if everything works. I have a file generated by version 1.7.50 which I was running
Hello,
I need to optimize a Linux program running under qemu-system-i386. qemu is
compiled with KVM support. File /proc/cpuinfo in the guest shows that SSE2
is supported.
If SSE2 is backed with host hardware, using SSE2 may improve my program's
performance significantly. The host is x86_64 Linux.
On 7/30/2014 9:14 AM, 邓尧 wrote:
Hello,
I need to optimize a Linux program running under qemu-system-i386. qemu
is compiled with KVM support. File /proc/cpuinfo in the guest shows that
SSE2 is supported.
If SSE2 is backed with host hardware, using SSE2 may improve my
program's performance
Hi
I am trying to increase the speed at which a guest runs in Qemu, so that I
can run a regression test on software within the guest OS in a shorter
amount of time. Hopefully this would allow a test that would take 6 hours
normally take less when run inside qemu. Is this possible using qemu or
From: graff zeltner gz...@mail.com
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:56:59 +0200
I was pleasantly surprised to find a plethora of options in the
latest qemu version 2.0.95. I have spent a couple of hours reading
the documentation, and unfortunately was not able to run the program
to see if
From: chester tinemas chester.tine...@gmail.com
I am trying to increase the speed at which a guest runs in Qemu, so that I
can run a regression test on software within the guest OS in a shorter
amount of time. Hopefully this would allow a test that would take 6 hours
normally take less when
Hi,
Ive built version 2.0.95 with the following sequence of steps:
git clone git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu.git
./configure halted on missing libfdt, so used
git submodule update --init dtc to fix missing dependency
./configure --prefix=/home/graf/test/qemu --target-list=i386-linux-user
If your main objective is performance, I don't think that there is
any question you should be considering LXC to eliminate overhead.
The reason why LXC is the ultimate in performance is because the
Guests run in a bare metal environment, resources are not virtualized
but simply isolated from
Hi,
Running the command which qemu-i386 and which qemu-system-x86_64 produces two different versions on my system. I am running Linux kernel 3.14. qemu-i386 resides in /usr/bin and is version 1.70 Debian, and qemu-system-x86_64 in /usr/local/bin is version 1.7.50 which I built from sources about
IMO, you should refactor your test. If regression test needs as long as 6
hours to complete, the test itself is a problem.
A simple and intuitive approach is to split the test cases into multiple
groups, and run the groups in parallel on different servers/VMs
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:09 AM,
10 matches
Mail list logo
