I opened at ticket at http://hub.qgis.org/issues/7515
and left it as "bug" because I really think that this is an error in the
GUI design.
Best wishes,
Anita
Am 05.04.2013, 05:18 Uhr, schrieb vinayan :
+1, that would be a good option..for example, in my data, once I know
that
entering 0.0
Hi Anita!
I'll probably take care of this at the HF (If noone else is taking it) as i
believe that every slider should have a connected spinbox to enter values
manually ..
kind regards
Werner
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Anita Graser wrote:
> I opened at ticket at
> http://hub.qgis.org/is
Hi all
I do not see about which "simplify tool" you are talking about. When I open
the Vector > Geometry > Simplify geometry , I get this :
http://picpaste.com/Capture_du_2013-04-05_12_22_30-C6KX48vK.png
It is not a slider, but a spinbox, which is fine.
Is there any other simplify tool I have mi
Am 05.04.2013, 12:24 Uhr, schrieb kimaidou :
Hi all
I do not see about which "simplify tool" you are talking about.
The one in Advanced Digitizing toolbar.
Anita
When I open
the Vector > Geometry > Simplify geometry , I get this :
http://picpaste.com/Capture_du_2013-04-05_12_22_30-C6KX
Hi!
It's in the "Advanced Editing" Toolbox .. when you edit a polygon layer..
kind regards
Werner
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:24 PM, kimaidou wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I do not see about which "simplify tool" you are talking about. When I
> open the Vector > Geometry > Simplify geometry , I get this
+1
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:11:49 +0200, Werner Macho wrote:
Hi Anita!
I'll probably take care of this at the HF (If noone else is taking
it)
as i believe that every slider should have a connected spinbox to
enter values manually ..
kind regards
Werner
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Anita Gra
Hi,
should be fixed in 6c2f8d1fc9.
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:04:04 +0200
"Anita Graser" wrote:
> I opened at ticket at http://hub.qgis.org/issues/7515
> and left it as "bug" because I really think that this is an error in the
> GUI design.
>
> Best wishes,
> Anita
--
Alexander Bruy
__
Ok
Thanks both for your quick answers
2013/4/5 Alexander Bruy
> Hi,
>
> should be fixed in 6c2f8d1fc9.
>
> On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:04:04 +0200
> "Anita Graser" wrote:
>
> > I opened at ticket at http://hub.qgis.org/issues/7515
> > and left it as "bug" because I really think that this is an erro
Thanks for the fast response!
Am 05.04.2013, 13:38 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Bruy
:
Hi,
should be fixed in 6c2f8d1fc9.
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:04:04 +0200
"Anita Graser" wrote:
I opened at ticket at http://hub.qgis.org/issues/7515
and left it as "bug" because I really think that this is an
Hi,
In master, we currently have (at least) two ways to select features by
location: Vector - Research Tools - Select by Location and Spatial Query
plugin. Both cover Intersection. Spatial Query also offers Contains and
Disjoint. Select by Location allows to compare a layer with itself whil
Hi Anita,
personally I prefer to keep only one tool.
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 14:37:24 +0200
"Anita Graser" wrote:
> Both cover Intersection. Spatial Query also offers Contains and
> Disjoint. Select by Location allows to compare a layer with itself while
> Spatial Query forces you to duplicate
Hi!
So as far as i can see there is only one difference - the "keeping" of the
layer - or forcing to duplicate the layer ..
Personaly I tend to keep everything clean and tidy too but I see not
disadvantage of having them both .. even more when one of them is "only" a
plugin..
So we already have th
Am 05.04.2013, 14:55 Uhr, schrieb Werner Macho :
Hi!
So as far as i can see there is only one difference - the "keeping" of
the
layer - or forcing to duplicate the layer ..
Personaly I tend to keep everything clean and tidy too but I see not
disadvantage of having them both .. even more when
Select by Location algorithm already present in SEXTANTE and it is
based on fTools code.
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:55:54 +0200
Werner Macho wrote:
> Hi!
>
> So as far as i can see there is only one difference - the "keeping" of the
> layer - or forcing to duplicate the layer ..
> Personaly I tend t
Hi dev's and contributors.
In preparation of the next Hackfest, in which I won't be able to join you, I
would like to share my personnal priorities for new features and
consolidation of QGIS 2.0.
Sorry for doing it now, when everybody is full time on 2.0 release, but I
think next hackfest is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 05/04/2013 16:27, Régis Haubourg ha scritto:
> Hi dev's and contributors. In preparation of the next Hackfest, in
> which I won't be able to join you, I would like to share my
> personnal priorities for new features and consolidation of QGIS
> 2.0.
Paolo Cavallini wrote
> Hi Régis,
> could you please explain this?
> Improve DB manager with a SQL query assistant similar to Qspatialite one.
> All the best.
> - --
> Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
Sure. DB Manager as a very nice SQL editor window with autocompletion.
Qspatialite embed the SQL Windo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 05/04/2013 17:26, Régis Haubourg ha scritto:
> Sure. DB Manager as a very nice SQL editor window with
> autocompletion. Qspatialite embed the SQL Window with a user
> interface close to Mapinfo SQL window, allowing to add table names,
> column name
Hi devs, I was wondering if there is a way to add coordinates in the following
formats currently it supports only Decimal Degrees and Eastings/Northings
however when working with GCS specially WGS84 one can receive the data in the
following formats Degrees Minutes and Secondse.g. 16 18 59.56810
Do anybody knows how can I draw a line starting at a point with an azimuth and
distance? I tried Improved Polygon Capturing (misleading name a bit) but
unfortunately it doesn't seem to do the work maybe because I am doing this with
layers in WGS 84 but projected coordinates. It would be great if
20 matches
Mail list logo
