-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 01/07/2013 09:48, HAUBOURG ha scritto:
That is always a pain since no tool exports csv in the same way when dealing
with
numerical / text types, decimal separators?
http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/xytools/ ?
all the best.
- --
Paolo
Hey Regis,
I think a Layer - Create Geometry Layer menu item would be a great idea
for non geometry layers.
Wouldn't be that hard to do I don't think.
Sqlite might be the best format as it's light and flexible. If you want
something dynamic i.e change the data, updates the points, then maybe a
Hi Regis, all,
You can also open a CSV with X.Y coordinates with a VRT file describing the
geometry component. You could automatically generate and load such a VRT with
an interface to guide the user.
Vincent
Le lundi 1 juillet 2013 09:48:00, HAUBOURG a écrit :
Hi all, let me precise the
The Add Delimited Text Layer import tool also has a watch file option
http://i.imgur.com/K1BL1zo.png
However this will only work for file based layers. I would like something
that would work for any type, PostGIS, MS SQL, etc.
- Nathan
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Vincent Picavet
Thanks Vincent,
you are right. We already discussed that with Chris on the list. The problem
is that it is restricted to CSV again, and that it creates a separate
datasource. We could also think of extending VRT to all datatypes in OGR,
and have a GUI letting user to generate and load that VRT.
Hey Regis,
I think a Layer - Create Geometry Layer menu item would be a great idea
for non geometry layers.
Wouldn't be that hard to do I don't think.
Sqlite might be the best format as it's light and flexible. If you want
something dynamic i.e change the data, updates the points, then maybe
I don't think VRT would work because not all QGIS data sources are OGR
based so VRT wouldn't work in that case.
A special type of layer, e.g plugin, IMO would be best for this. Something
that just reads the feature from the underlying layer and adds the geometry
on the fly.
- Nathan
On Mon,
Hi all,
There were some discussions about the relation of the recently announced QGIS
Enterprise [1] and the upcoming QGIS 2.0 release.
QGIS Enterprise was born out of the needs of our customers for a stable QGIS
branch with frequent bug fix releases similar to the Ubuntu LTS model. Almost
all
Hi,
Is this going to be an open initiative or limited to a Sourcepole's
offering ? Will you backport translations ?
regards,
jean-roc
On 2013-07-01 12:20, Pirmin Kalberer wrote:
Hi all,
There were some discussions about the relation of the recently
announced QGIS
Enterprise [1] and the
Hi
I really like the idea of a LTS version of QGIS. Is there any chance to see a
community edition (free) of QGIS Enterprise?
Regards
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Im
Auftrag von Pirmin
Hi,
What is the license of QGIS Enterprise?
Noli
On 7/1/13, Ziegler Stefan stefan.zieg...@bd.so.ch wrote:
Hi
I really like the idea of a LTS version of QGIS. Is there any chance to see
a community edition (free) of QGIS Enterprise?
Regards
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
QGIS 2.0/Master branch
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It is GPL
Sent from some fancy phone looking thingo
From: Noli Sicad
Sent: 1/07/2013 9:16 PM
To: Ziegler Stefan
Cc: qgis-u...@lists.osgeo.org;
So, if It (QGIS Enterprise) is GPL, why Stefan is asking for
community edition (free) of QGIS Enterprise?
Noli
On 7/1/13, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
QGIS 2.0/Master branch
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Noli,
Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013, 21.16:36 schrieb Noli Sicad:
What is the license of QGIS Enterprise?
QGIS Enterprise is GPL licensed and the source code is available for all
customers.
Pirmin
On 7/1/13, Ziegler Stefan stefan.zieg...@bd.so.ch wrote:
Hi
I really like the idea of
Hi Jean-Roc,
Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013, 13.01:42 schrieb jr.morre...@enoreth.net:
Is this going to be an open initiative or limited to a Sourcepole's
offering ? Will you backport translations ?
QGIS Enterprise is an internal QGIS branch maintained by Sourcepole.
We backport translations as
Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013, 21.31:00 schrieb Noli Sicad:
So, if It (QGIS Enterprise) is GPL, why Stefan is asking for
community edition (free) of QGIS Enterprise?
I guess Stefan would like to see a community maintained stable branch of QGIS.
This was discussed a few times on this list and was
Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013, 21.34:08 schrieb Noli Sicad:
Please clarify all customers?
A customer is an organisation/person with a Basic, Corporate, Premium or
Strategic QGIS Enterprise contract.
See http://qgisenterprise.com/unser-angebot/pricing/
Pirmin
On 7/1/13, Pirmin Kalberer
On 2013-07-01 13:33, Pirmin Kalberer wrote:
Hi Jean-Roc,
Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013, 13.01:42 schrieb jr.morre...@enoreth.net:
Is this going to be an open initiative or limited to a Sourcepole's
offering ? Will you backport translations ?
QGIS Enterprise is an internal QGIS branch maintained
Hi Pirmin,
On Mon, 01. Jul 2013 at 13:38:42 +0200, Pirmin Kalberer wrote:
I guess Stefan would like to see a community maintained stable branch of
QGIS. This was discussed a few times on this list and was actually done for
older QGIS versions, but there were not enough resources for
Hi Noli,
On Mon, 01. Jul 2013 at 21:31:00 +1000, Noli Sicad wrote:
So, if It (QGIS Enterprise) is GPL, why Stefan is asking for community
edition (free) of QGIS Enterprise?
AFAIK the GPL doesn't require to distribute source to the public - just to
those you gave binaries to.
So assuming that
I don't know how QGIS people interpret GPL based on this wikipedia definition.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License
Noli
On 7/1/13, Pirmin Kalberer pi...@sourcepole.com wrote:
Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013, 21.34:08 schrieb Noli Sicad:
Please clarify all customers?
A customer
Yes an no :)
There is a stable branch of QGIS: QGIS Enterprise. If you got enough costumers
who does have some contract I think it would be great to grant access to QGIS
Enterprise to public.
Regards
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
Yes, Stefan is asking for a community driven based one. One that comes
from qgis.org rather then another company. Not that there is anything
wrong with what sourepole are doing, it's a great idea to support customers
and being under GPL gives anyone the ability to do that.
We have talked about
I rather see this QGIS Enterprise license under LGPL than GPL.
Noli
On 7/1/13, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, Stefan is asking for a community driven based one. One that comes
from qgis.org rather then another company. Not that there is anything
wrong with what sourepole are
Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013, 13.51:31 schrieb jr.morre...@enoreth.net:
On 2013-07-01 13:33, Pirmin Kalberer wrote:
Hi Jean-Roc,
Am Montag, 1. Juli 2013, 13.01:42 schrieb jr.morre...@enoreth.net:
Is this going to be an open initiative or limited to a Sourcepole's
offering ? Will you
It's pretty simple in this case really.
Sourcepole have an internal branch of QGIS that they maintain.
This version of the code is still under GPL because QGIS is.
Sourcepole give binaries and make source available to customers.
If I am a customer, under the GPL I am able to redistribute the
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Noli Sicad nsi...@gmail.com wrote:
I rather see this QGIS Enterprise license under LGPL than GPL
You can't. QGIS Enterprise == QGIS + extra stuff.
- Nathan
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Yes and the code is available on our github repository.
regards
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:qgis-developer-
boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Im Auftrag von Pirmin Kalberer
Gesendet: Montag, 1. Juli 2013 14:08
An:
On 7/1/13, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Noli Sicad nsi...@gmail.com wrote:
I rather see this QGIS Enterprise license under LGPL than GPL
You can't. QGIS Enterprise == QGIS + extra stuff.
- Nathan
In my opinion, if it is GPL, QGIS Enterprise
If Sourcepole would like to follow with OpenGeo business model, that is fine.
Remember that OpenGeo provides,
1. Enterprise version, and
2. Community version.
Noli
On 7/1/13, Ziegler Stefan stefan.zieg...@bd.so.ch wrote:
Yes and the code is available on our github repository.
regards
Releasing the source code to the public isn't a requirement of the GPL
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic
However once you give the source code to someone they can post it, so
basically they can make it public for you.
Normally companies do release the source
Hi all,
Just for info, googling QGIS 2 release led me here:
http://docs.qgis.org/2.0/html/en/docs/qgis_governance/release_checklists/release-2.0.html
It might be good to update this page with dates in the future ;)
Also, I was wondering if you have any intention to change the repo name
from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 01/07/2013 14:51, Denis Rouzaud ha scritto:
Just for info, googling QGIS 2 release led me here:
http://docs.qgis.org/2.0/html/en/docs/qgis_governance/release_checklists/release-2.0.html
It might be good to update this page with dates in the
Hello,
My understanding is that it is a commercial service, so you don't have any
licence.
QGIS is open source, all code source and patches are already publics or in
master. If I understood correctly, QGIS entreprise is a binary with backward
patches, maintenance and support services.
Hi,
On QGIS master in Windows I have the issue that the selected rows (when
I select the features in the map) in the table are not salient enough.
They appear in a very similar light gray as every odd row. This means I
cannot easily distinguish an odd row from a selected row. See this
Confirmed,
But as soon as you scroll, all the gray rows turn blue. Can you pleas
open a bug for this.
Matthias
On Mon 01 Jul 2013 16:13:45 CEST, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On QGIS master in Windows I have the issue that the selected rows
(when I select the features in the map) in the table
Hi Marco,
I have created a project with a composer with 2 maps and one as
overviewFrameMap.
Do you think this one has to be in the WMS Capabilities ?
Do we can exclude this one form WMS Capabilities ?
Regards,
René-Luc
___
Qgis-developer mailing
Hi Matthias,
Yes - I can confirm that the background turns blue after scrolling.
I opened this bug: http://hub.qgis.org/issues/8205
Thanks,
Andreas
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:55:08 +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
Confirmed,
But as soon as you scroll, all the gray rows turn blue. Can you pleas
open
Hi Marco,
The way I understand overview map is :
* fixed extent
* fixed layers
* fixed scale
But it's true that client can specified some informations.
Could we imagine a way to identify overview map in composer ?
Regards,
René-Luc
Le 01/07/2013 17:40, Marco Hugentobler a écrit :
Hi René-Luc
Hi René-Luc
Why do you want the overview frame map be removed from capabilities? In
a GetPrint request, the extent of all maps is undefined unless specified
from the client. How would you set the extent of the overview map if not
given by the client (fixed zoom-out ratio?)
Regards,
Marco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Is there a good reason for this?
http://plugins.qgis.org/search/?q=Life
no results
http://plugins.qgis.org/search/?q=Lifemapper
http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/lifemapperTools/
All the best.
- --
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
* fixed extent
I don't know if this is always true. Sometimes the overview map is only
zoomed out a bit (e.g. QGIS map canvas overview map is not necessarily
zoomed to full extent, it can also move).
Could we imagine a way to identify overview map in composer ?
It would be straightforward
What kind of API backward compatibility do we support in the major
release line? Binary or source?
In particular, if there is a method:
method()
and I need to extend that method with a param:
method(bool f = true)
and with the default value it works like the original method(), is it
Hi,
In case anyone was wondering...
I have been absent from the community for the last two weeks, though I have
been trying to follow along. My wife and I just had son (our second kid),
who showed up a full month ahead of his due date.
I am now back to a somewhat regular schedule and can devote
Congratulations Larry!
my second little girl was born nine month ago now, try to keep some sleep!
Régis
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Labeling-issues-update-tp5063407p5063414.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Where can one find the changes to the API for the current development version
(1.9) and the 1.8.
I am trying to update past version plugins.
Thank you,
Maaza
-
Maaza Christos, PhD
www.Axumcorp.com
--
View this message in context:
I just found out through a simple search. Ignore my request.
Thank you,
-
Maaza Christos, PhD
www.Axumcorp.com
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/API-C-changes-between-1-8-and-2-0-tp5063416p5063418.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing
Congratulations Larry!
Robert
On 01.07.2013 21:49, Larry Shaffer wrote:
Hi,
In case anyone was wondering...
I have been absent from the community for the last two weeks, though I
have been trying to follow along. My wife and I just had son (our second
kid), who showed up a full month ahead of
Congratulations Larry!
Hope your wife and son are doing great.
-
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Larry Shaffer lar...@dakotacarto.comwrote:
Hi,
In case anyone was wondering...
I have been absent from the community for the last two weeks, though I
have been trying to follow along. My
49 matches
Mail list logo
