Re: [Qgis-developer] Identified features vs. Selected features : could we merge those ?

Hi, I am skeptical - mainly for the reasons you list in your rationale against it. Selection and identification are really two different tasks. You do not want to loose your selection just because you want to query the attributes of the feature. Identification works with all layers, while selecti

Re: [Qgis-developer] Identified features vs. Selected features : could we merge those ?

On 03. 04. 14 07:55, Nyall Dawson wrote: On 03/04/2014 9:18 am, "Olivier Dalang" > wrote: > I guess I missed some uses of the "identify results" window ? > What about rasters? They can be queried using the identify tool... That could a new tool with a bet

Re: [Qgis-developer] Identified features vs. Selected features : could we merge those ?

On 03/04/2014 9:18 am, "Olivier Dalang" wrote: > I guess I missed some uses of the "identify results" window ? > What about rasters? They can be queried using the identify tool... Nyall ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org ht

Re: [Qgis-developer] Identified features vs. Selected features : could we merge those ?

Hi Olivier, I always thought it was a good idea, and you did a nice overview. That would be a big +1 for, me, mainly because there is a big redundancy between these two features. Also, I think that the identify modes should be cleaned up. The new "layer slection" mode is very useful and does s

[Qgis-developer] Spatial reference systems and Area of applicability

Hi, This is something I discussed with Paolo during the past Code Sprint. In the original EPSG databases, there is an area of applicability defined as a bounding box in latitude,longitude for each spatial reference system. In the import process of the EPSG database used for libgeotiff, GDAL, pr

[Qgis-developer] Identified features vs. Selected features : could we merge those ?

Hi ! The discussions about this issue http://hub.qgis.org/issues/9907 raised the question (at least for me) of merging the concepts of Identified features and Selected features. I don't know if it's the good moment to discuss this, but since we have a few other threads talking about a bit more de

Re: [Qgis-developer] Ranking GSoC proposals

Hi, Sorry for the late response, but I am out of the office today and tomorrow. The idea of the plugin is to develop some functions for schematization. Suchith and Mark Ware have a previous research and they established some constraints that we can use as a starting point. Also the work of Piotr is

Re: [Qgis-developer] Issues with GRASS plugin

Hi. Thanks for checking. Notes inline. Pretty bad stuff. Anybody plans to fix this? Il 01/04/2014 21:20, Giovanni Manghi ha scritto: >> I open a raster, click on Edit grass region, change just the resolution, >> then I run r.slope - > the resulting map has the resolution of the input >> dtm, not t

Re: [Qgis-developer] Issues with GRASS plugin

Sorry, sending it too fast. Hi. Thanks for checking. Notes inline. Pretty bad stuff. Anybody plans to fix this? Il 01/04/2014 21:20, Giovanni Manghi ha scritto: >> I open a raster, click on Edit grass region, change just the resolution, >> then I run r.slope - > the resulting map has the resoluti

Re: [Qgis-developer] master slow reading rasters?

Hi Olivier On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Olivier Dalang wrote: > > As far as I see, here what's happening upon user interaction (zoom or pan) > > 1) the previously displayed image is displayed offsetted/resampled > (instantaneous) > 2) the image disappears for a short amount of time (probably

Re: [Qgis-developer] Vienna hackfest: QGIS Legend discussion

Hi again, > -Message d'origine- > De : Martin Dobias [mailto:wonder...@gmail.com] > Envoyé : mercredi 2 avril 2014 13:15 > À : HAUBOURG > Cc : qgis-dev > Objet : Re: [Qgis-developer] Vienna hackfest: QGIS Legend discussion > > Hi Régis > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Régis Haubourg

Re: [Qgis-developer] Vienna hackfest: QGIS Legend discussion

Hi Régis On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Régis Haubourg wrote: >> >> This is not part of the refactoring work, but it is very interesting >> use case and therefore I will keep it in mind and do the design in a >> manner that adding such functionality should be possible. Advanced >> legend manipu

Re: [Qgis-developer] Vienna hackfest: QGIS Legend discussion

On 2 April 2014 11:55, Régis Haubourg wrote: > Hi Martin, does that mean that we need to wait that your refactoring is > finished before starting a work on proportionnal legends? What is the > target > version for that? > This is a high priority use case here, should we fund a temporary plugin > f

Re: [Qgis-developer] Vienna hackfest: QGIS Legend discussion

Hi Martin, thanks a lot for your feedback. I have some questions: Martin Dobias wrote > Hi > > First of all thanks everyone who contributed to this thread - there > were many interesting ideas that we can discuss further. > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Régis Haubourg > < > regis.ha

Re: [Qgis-developer] PlugIn Approval: VoGisProfilTool 1.8.7

On 02-04-14 11:05, Wilhelm Berg wrote: > > Please approve new version of VoGIS Profiltool: done ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Qgis-developer] PlugIn Approval: VoGisProfilTool 1.8.7

Please approve new version of VoGIS Profiltool: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/VoGisProfilTool/ I've added more checks for invalid geometries. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-d