Hi Devs,
to me the way qgis handles .osm files seems broken, see:
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/1
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/10427
apparently ogr returns -1 on the number of features, but more important
the feature interator seems broken
Problems: loading an osm file and viewing the
Hi all,
To fix the issue of the expression widget being too large in
categorized/graduated symbology pages, I had to remove the scroll area
from the main layout.
I don't think it's a problem, and I believe that if a scroll area is
needed it should be done in the next level (i.e. in the pages
Il 06/06/2014 00:49, Kari Salovaara ha scritto:
Conclusions
Plugin is useful and thus very acceptable, but
- it can be installed only by person who knows what to do, those people who do
digitizing are not always programmers (very seldom)
- to tell where the actual workhorse is situated is
Hi devs,
Being able to use transactions has a couple of advantages for users of
databases:
* Databases are prepared for multi user access. A transaction handles
concurrent access on DB side.
* Immediate feedback if a constraint is violated. With the edit buffer
in QGIS, constraints are checked
Hi all.
The new QGIS version will be released very soon. There are still 58 blocking
issues,
growing. Some of them are quite nasty. I urge everybody, and especially those
who use
QGIS in large organization, saving tons of money previously spent in licences,
to
quickly invest a fraction of these
Sure. The Icons are loading from resoureces.py .
hibo.py:
# Import the PyQt and QGIS libraries
from PyQt4 import QtCore, QtGui
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
from PyQt4.QtGui import *
from qgis.core import *
# Initialize Qt resources from file resources.py
import resources
import sys
import os
#
Hi Paolo,
I'm still searching a way to sponsor you, and have good hopes we will find a
way. but it won't make it for 2.4.
And we will probably be finding a solution only available for my
organization. I would have prefered to find a way that other public users in
France could repeat, so that we
BTW, the very short release cycle is really complicated for us. Deploying
prod version and testing new versions periods overshoot here. I'm alone on
that topic, and partial time only. Having longer release candidate period,
and a 6 months release cycle could help for me.
--
View this message
One more issue I have found is that the commit below introduces a crash if
you add layers from different crs's.
timlinux@channel:~/dev/cpp/QGIS$ git bisect good
a04ebf9eb012bb7b6f05300e5d3e676e4603553e is the first bad commit
commit a04ebf9eb012bb7b6f05300e5d3e676e4603553e
Author: Martin Dobias
Hi,
I kind of agree. I also think the one month testing phase is too short
to properly deal with all of the bugs.
Maybe a six month release cycle with 4 month development and 2 month
testing would be more useful in the future.
Furthermore, we would probably need at least one bugfix release.
Il 06/06/2014 11:36, Régis Haubourg ha scritto:
BTW, the very short release cycle is really complicated for us. Deploying
prod version and testing new versions periods overshoot here. I'm alone on
that topic, and partial time only. Having longer release candidate period,
and a 6 months release
Il 06/06/2014 11:42, Andreas Neumann ha scritto:
But I know you have discussed this back and forth ... and there is no
single solution that fits for everyone.
yes, that's the point IMHO.
BTW: I believe our finances would allow to again sponsor 1 week of paid
bug fixing from the QGIS funds.
The longer release time isn't for users its for us devs. After the feature
freeze is lifted features start going in adding more bugs. So a longer
release cycle with 2 months bug fix would allow for more polish.
This release was of course a major change adding some big stuff maybe we
just expand
Hi Tim,
this one was fixed this morning in PR #1429 :-)
Regards
Martin
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com wrote:
One more issue I have found is that the commit below introduces a crash if
you add layers from different crs's.
timlinux@channel:~/dev/cpp/QGIS$ git
Hello,
Le vendredi 6 juin 2014 11:08:57, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
The new QGIS version will be released very soon. There are still 58
blocking issues, growing. Some of them are quite nasty. I urge everybody,
and especially those who use QGIS in large organization, saving tons of
money
On 06/06/2014 8:20 pm, Vincent Picavet vincent...@oslandia.com wrote:
Could we make a more visible RC release on the website, encouraging
testing ?
I think that our user are not used yet to our new release cycle. We really
should educate them, and lower the barrier to RC testing and bug
Hello,
Le vendredi 6 juin 2014 12:30:23, Nyall Dawson a écrit :
On 06/06/2014 8:20 pm, Vincent Picavet vincent...@oslandia.com wrote:
Could we make a more visible RC release on the website, encouraging
testing ?
I think that our user are not used yet to our new release cycle. We
really
2014-06-06 13:16 GMT+03:00 Vincent Picavet vincent...@oslandia.com:
Could we make a more visible RC release on the website, encouraging testing ?
I think that our user are not used yet to our new release cycle. We really
should educate them, and lower the barrier to RC testing and bug
Hi
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.net wrote:
Hi,
I kind of agree. I also think the one month testing phase is too short
to properly deal with all of the bugs.
Maybe a six month release cycle with 4 month development and 2 month
testing would be more
On 06/06/2014 8:51 pm, Vincent Picavet vincent...@oslandia.com wrote:
More bug reports, bug comments and better bug reports is already a lot of
developer's time saved.
Having more testers (and regular testers) is as important as having
developers
to fix bugs.
Sorry if I didn't word my
While testing and reporting is important without a doubt, the currently
outstanding issues could be fixed easily by the end of the month as soon
as resources are available.
The main point is, that we should start improving where there is the
biggest effect - and that's paid bugfixing time. There
Il 06/06/2014 13:46, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
Not yet but we can table it in our PSC meeting tonight. And yes there is no
single
release cycle that will keep everyone happy. The other suggestion we had once
was to
make every third (or other increment) release purely a bug fix release. Those
Il 06/06/2014 13:57, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
That means: go out, tell your neighbours and social media buddies and
customers about the RC and testing. But if you want the bugs they report
to be fixed, make sure that there's somebody taking care of them. The
main problems normally are not
Hi,
Le vendredi 6 juin 2014 13:34:12, Alexander Bruy a écrit :
2014-06-06 13:16 GMT+03:00 Vincent Picavet vincent...@oslandia.com:
Could we make a more visible RC release on the website, encouraging
testing ?
I think that our user are not used yet to our new release cycle. We
really
Il 06/06/2014 13:17, Hugo Ledoux ha scritto:
A windows Installer would be nice, but, Paulo, do you mean that QGIS would add
prepair? That would be tricky, since we use CGAL too. But that would be great.
The plugin should remember the path of the EXE, it does on all computers we've
tested.
I'm not sure just adding it to QGIS like that is the best idea really, it's
a bit bolt on. It would be better to port the prepair C++ logic into QGIS
itself to use QGIS geometry rather then GDAL. We could then just expose the
API and wrap it in Python to expose in Processing.
- Nathan
On Fri,
Le vendredi 06 juin 2014 08:55:39, Richard Duivenvoorde a écrit :
Hi Devs,
to me the way qgis handles .osm files seems broken, see:
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/1
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/10427
apparently ogr returns -1 on the number of features, but more important
the feature
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Alexander Bruy alexander.b...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-06-06 13:16 GMT+03:00 Vincent Picavet vincent...@oslandia.com:
Could we make a more visible RC release on the website, encouraging testing ?
I think that our user are not used yet to our new release cycle. We
==
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20140606/ee0cc789/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 13:57:51 +0200
From: Matthias Kuhn matthias.k
Il 06/06/2014 14:45, Hugo Ledoux ha scritto:
My colleagues and I are willing to help if there is interest from the
community in having prepair included in QGIS.
However, I believe, like Nathan, that including the current version is
sub-optimal: we’re just calling the binary and pass the WKT
Le vendredi 06 juin 2014 14:48:01, Richard Duivenvoorde a écrit :
On 06-06-14 14:26, Even Rouault wrote:
Le vendredi 06 juin 2014 08:55:39, Richard Duivenvoorde a écrit :
Hi Devs,
to me the way qgis handles .osm files seems broken, see:
Richard,
Jukka pretty much answered rightly
Hi
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tim,
this one was fixed this morning in PR #1429 :-)
Doh! I am always one step behind :-)
Thanks!
Regards
Tim
Regards
Martin
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com wrote:
One
I have just written a blog post and added it to Twitter, Google+, Facebook.
I have also updated the banners on all those sites to show the RC banner.
Blog post is at http://nathanw.net/2014/06/06/help-qgis/
- Nathan
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Anita Graser anitagra...@gmx.at wrote:
On
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:11 PM, qgis-developer-requ...@lists.osgeo.org wrote:
I also agree with Nathan: would you like to cooperate with QGIS core team, and
incorporate your logic, possibly your code, in QGIS itself?
All the best.
Yes we’re willing to do that. It should be stressed out here
Hello all,
Not sure if this is how it works, but can we propose that the ?small?
donations gathered by the Portuguese Users Group (570€) be directed for
this bugfixing?
Thanks,
Alexandre Neto
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Matthias Kuhn matthias.k...@gmx.ch wrote:
While testing and
Hi all,
*Weekly Report 3*
*What was done this week?*
- Solved tickets/issues
https://github.com/nishithm/schematization/issues?state=open which
were created by the mentor on GitHub. It included addition of progress
update (in terms of percentage) while running the algorithm and also
Paolo,
Please notice that the donations were already sent as several paypal
payments.
Alexandre Neto
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it
wrote:
Il 06/06/2014 15:49, Alexandre Neto ha scritto:
Not sure if this is how it works, but can we propose that the
Il 06/06/2014 15:49, Alexandre Neto ha scritto:
Not sure if this is how it works, but can we propose that the ?small?
donations
gathered by the Portuguese Users Group (570€) be directed for this bugfixing?
thant would help, thanks.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi QGIS e PostGIS:
Hi
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tim,
this one was fixed this morning in PR #1429 :-)
Doh! I am always one step behind :-)
Ok that works fine for me now. And you
Il 05/06/2014 08:03, Luca Manganelli ha scritto:
You can try our server:
http://webapps.comune.trento.it/ogc
BTW, the server throws an error when layers are added from the browser:
Map request error (Title:Eccezione servizio; Error:La richiesta contiene un
formato
non disponibile dal
Il 06/06/2014 16:39, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
Il 05/06/2014 08:03, Luca Manganelli ha scritto:
http://webapps.comune.trento.it/ogc
BTW, the server throws an error when layers are added from the browser:
Map request error (Title:Eccezione servizio; Error:La richiesta contiene un
Hi Hugo,
About a month ago, I created a formula for prepair in the OSGeo4Mac
Homebrew tap [0,1].
I would appreciate it if you would review it, and possibly do any pull
requests for changes you feel are appropriate. Specifically, what options
you used to create the new Mac binary for your plugin,
Is missing the image format declaration.
This work.
I guess the format is mandatory for wms.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
http://webapps.comune.trento.it/ogc
BTW, the server throws an error when layers are added from the browser:
Map request error (Title:Eccezione servizio; Error:La richiesta contiene un
formato
I see that your URL
Il 06/06/2014 15:29, Hugo Ledoux ha scritto:
Yes we’re willing to do that. It should be stressed out here that we
use CGAL (www.cgal.org, which is GPL) and its depends (GMP, MPFR,
Boost).
good news. anyone see the dependencies as a problem?
all the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Managinng the CGAL dependency would be useful for (SF)CGAL too. Today it's
used only by PostGIS, internally, but maybe its use will extend in the
future (hopefully for 3D in QGIS too!).
giovanni
2014-06-06 17:51 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it:
Il 06/06/2014 15:29, Hugo Ledoux
SFCGAL is a real hard to compile piece of software. Use it on qgis mean to
transformer the qgis in a real hard to compile software .
:)
Il 06/giu/2014 17:55 G. Allegri gioha...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Managinng the CGAL dependency would be useful for (SF)CGAL too. Today it's
used only by
Il 06/06/2014 18:24, Andrea Peri ha scritto:
SFCGAL is a real hard to compile piece of software. Use it on qgis mean to
transformer the qgis in a real hard to compile software .
cgal is packaged in all mayor OSs, AFAIK, so no need to compile it.
all the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini -
AFAIK it is noto available in debian stabile. Don't ?
Also surely it is not available in RH enterprise.
I guess surely it is available in ubuntu and fedora.
Il 06/giu/2014 18:26 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it ha scritto:
Il 06/06/2014 18:24, Andrea Peri ha scritto:
SFCGAL is a real
Il 06/06/2014 18:32, Andrea Peri ha scritto:
AFAIK it is noto available in debian stabile. Don't ?
I do not think our target for QGIS = 2.4 is Debian stable.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi QGIS e PostGIS:
Do you guess the sfcgal is available on windows ?
Il 06/giu/2014 18:38 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it ha scritto:
Il 06/06/2014 18:32, Andrea Peri ha scritto:
AFAIK it is noto available in debian stabile. Don't ?
I do not think our target for QGIS = 2.4 is Debian stable.
Someone
Il 06/06/2014 18:41, Andrea Peri ha scritto:
Do you guess the sfcgal is available on windows ?
prepair needs cgal, not sfcgal
all the best
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
___
I speak of giohappy proposal of sfcgal.
Il 06/giu/2014 18:42 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it ha scritto:
Il 06/06/2014 18:41, Andrea Peri ha scritto:
Do you guess the sfcgal is available on windows ?
prepair needs cgal, not sfcgal
all the best
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
I've noticed the new version of the Value Tool plugin (0.8.4) automatically
have the Enable button unchecked when another tool is selected. What is
the rationale for this change? I draw polygons on top of raster files to
be used during post processing and need the raster values for reference.
CGAL is a prerequisite for SFCGAL. I'm not saying we should worry for
having SFCGAL, but analyzing the dependency for prepair is useful for
(eventually) having SFCGAL or whatever else based on CGAL.
giovanni
2014-06-06 18:45 GMT+02:00 Andrea Peri aperi2...@gmail.com:
I speak of giohappy
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it
wrote:
Il 06/06/2014 18:24, Andrea Peri ha scritto:
SFCGAL is a real hard to compile piece of software. Use it on qgis mean
to
transformer the qgis in a real hard to compile software .
cgal is packaged in all
Paolo,
just to understand better :
what do you mena as our target for QGIS
?
I don't gind any page in QGIS site say-inf the targets OS .
Instead I see the download page will offer:
Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, OpenSuse, RHEL (and various rhel like distro),
Mandriva, ArchLinux,
and ofcourse MAc, and
Dear Larry,
The prepair Mac binary was made by linking to static versions of CGAL, boost,
GMP, GMPXX, MPFI and MPFR, and only linking dynamically to Kyngchaos’ GDAL
framework. The idea was that if people use Kyngchaos’ QGIS package, they
already have his GDAL framework since it is a
I have implemented this to be able to identify on a mouse click instead of
whenever you move the mouse (this is an optional behaviour). This requires
the tool being a map tool, and you cannot have more than one active map
tool.
However, when the mouse click option is not enabled, it is NOT used
Hi Ken,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Ken Arroyo Ohori
g.a.k.arroyooh...@tudelft.nl wrote:
Dear Larry,
The prepair Mac binary was made by linking to static versions of CGAL,
boost, GMP, GMPXX, MPFI and MPFR, and only linking dynamically to
Kyngchaos’ GDAL framework. The idea was that if
Hi Larry,
Maybe I’m mistaken here, but doesn’t Homebrew always compile from source?
Because if so, I’d think that even the mostly statically linked binary would
still need to download and install a Boost bottle (albeit one that creates a
static version of the libraries).
But in any case, if
Ok, thanks. I filed a bug for this: http://hub.qgis.org/issues/10490
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Etienne Tourigny etourigny@gmail.com
wrote:
I have implemented this to be able to identify on a mouse click instead of
whenever you move the mouse (this is an optional behaviour). This
I actually fixed this last month, and forgot to upload a new version. I've
been busy finishing my PhD the last few months which explains this!
I have just uploaded version 0.8.5 to the plugin repos.
Etienne
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Jamie Adams jaad...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, thanks. I
I just updated - it's now working as expected. Thanks for the quick fix.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Etienne Tourigny etourigny@gmail.com
wrote:
I actually fixed this last month, and forgot to upload a new version. I've
been busy finishing my PhD the last few months which explains
Hi i see the getcapabilities returned from QS is not xsd valid.
This deny use it in many usecases rather then getmap.
We fund often qgis develop. But i Mike understand why qgis has an invalido
xml respinse. Is this a not importante questione for the qgis developer.
Also i like understand if
65 matches
Mail list logo
