Hi Nikolai
Oh sorry, was reading the mail in a rush and meant raster tiles.
I don't have much experience with vector tiles. Afaik, they come without
symbolisation? If yes, is there a reason why the vector tile serving
needs to be inside QGIS server? Or could you just use another
application
Is http://qgis.org/downloads/ any use?
Tom
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Boundlessgeo-QGIS-tp5272336p5272339.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Qgis-developer mai
Tom
No, it will not do, as I specifically need the Boundless version.
Thank you anyway
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Tom Chadwin
wrote:
> Is http://qgis.org/downloads/ any use?
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Boundlessgeo-QGIS-tp52723
What are differences between the Boundless and the official version?
I thought they only made a plugin to integrate it within their suite of
services. I didn't know it was a fork!
Giovanni
Il 19/giu/2016 10:22 AM, "Pieter du Plooy" ha
scritto:
> Tom
>
> No, it will not do, as I specifically need
It depends on what you mean with "fork", it is a fork in github sense and
it's here: https://github.com/boundlessgeo/QGIS
Specifically:
https://github.com/boundlessgeo/QGIS/tree/release-2_14-boundless
The only differences are in the installer and in the particular commits
that were included in th
Im not a huge fan of the "community version" terminology.
QGIS has an official version, found on qgis.org, and a number of flavors
such as boundless :)
On 19 Jun 2016 15:48, "Alessandro Pasotti" wrote:
> It depends on what you mean with "fork", it is a fork in github sense and
> it's here: http
Interesting. May I know why?
All the best.
Il 19 giugno 2016 11:22:16 EEST, Pieter du Plooy ha
scritto:
>Tom
>
>No, it will not do, as I specifically need the Boundless version.
>
>Thank you anyway
>
>On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Tom Chadwin
>wrote:
>
>> Is http://qgis.org/downloads/ any us
Well, first of all, there is officially no such thing as a "community
version" (you can google qgis.org's main domain and documentation, you
won't find a single mention or use of that term).
There's also precedents in the open source world (MySQL comes to mind here)
where a legal entity does a fre
Hi,
On Sun, 19. Jun 2016 at 16:09:16 +0700, Mathieu Pellerin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Paolo Cavallini
> wrote:
> > Il 19 giugno 2016 11:22:16 EEST, Pieter du Plooy
> > ha scritto:
> > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Tom Chadwin
> > > wrote:
> > > > Is http://qgis.org/down
Hi Mathieu,
On Sun, 19. Jun 2016 at 15:57:05 +0700, Mathieu Pellerin wrote:
> Im not a huge fan of the "community version" terminology.
Same here - where "community version" is used it's often describes a crippled
version that is missing some functionality.
Jürgen
[5 (in words: five) "signatur
Ok, no problem with having "custom" versions. I wouldn't call "community
version" the official one for the same reasons exposed by others.
I'm only concerned for the rise of questions similar to this post, where
users ask for support on custom versions with the serious risk of great
confusion. Whoe
Hi All,
I want to share the progress of QGIS Symbology Sharing Tool for the GSoC
project. This tool will allow you to share collections (symbol, svgs, etc)
in a repository, fetch it, and use it in QGIS.
What did you get done this week?
This week I worked on:
*Handler Classes*
Handler class is r
Hi,
I agree with Jürgen and Matthieu - "community version" has kind of a
negative touch. Although the original replier (Alessandro) probably did
not intend/imply this.
The official version from QGIS.ORG shouldn't be called "community
version" - it is the "offical version".
Andreas
On 19.0
Hi Matthias,
Thank you for these fixes - it is now more intuitive for me than before
- and still shows the internatl feature ID - should one dev or admin
need it.
Andreas
On 17.06.2016 19:19, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
Hi Andreas,
as of today there's also the feature id shown in the tooltip of t
Oh, gosh sorry, didn't know how to call them to distinguish clearly,
forgive me! And as Andreas said, my personal feeling is that something
"Community" has no less value than anything else, on the contrary I value
it more because it comes from a community instead of an individual or a
company.
Ple
Official is the right word to me.
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 9:58 pm Alessandro Pasotti wrote:
> Oh, gosh sorry, didn't know how to call them to distinguish clearly,
> forgive me! And as Andreas said, my personal feeling is that something
> "Community" has no less value than anything else, on the contr
On 19-06-16 13:59, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
> Official is the right word to me.
Yep, to me too, all others are ... non-offical :-)
Richard
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qg
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for the feedback.
Just a short note to avoid confusion: the number in old versions
(<=2.14) was not the feature id.
Matthias
On 19/06/16 13:17, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Thank you for these fixes - it is now more intuitive for me than
> before - and still shows
Hi,
Just use the following
from qgis.core import QgsRasterLayer
layer = QgsRasterLayer(u"/your/path/your_hdf5_file")
if (len(layer.subLayers()) > 1):
sub_layer = QgsRasterLayer(layer.subLayers()[1], 'sub layer') # Choose
arbitrarily the 2nd sub layer
QgsMapLayerRegistry.instance().addMa
On 19 June 2016 23:58:06 GMT+12:00, Alessandro Pasotti
wrote:
>
>
>"official" is better than "community" ?
>
>What is the preferred way?
>
>"Official" on the contrary sounds a lot like bureocracy to me.
>
I think "just" QGIS. The other versions dhould be referred as boundless QGIS,
xyz QGIS,
Hi,
These are thoughts on sharing 1. a whole QGIS symbology and 2. a whole
QGIS project including symbology and data.
There's a promising current GSoC project, where users ("designers,
cartographers") can << share QGIS style files >> incl. styles (.qml),
symbols (.xml) and SVG markers. End users
HI Stefan,
I am the one doing that GSoC project. You remind me that I need to update
the project description in osgeo wiki. The concept has changed a lot since
then. We decided that we would go with sharing collections to a directory
based repository (For now I will implement it for Github and Bit
Hi Stefan,
I just read your All-In-One Project Plugin documentation here (are you
about to develop it? or already developed it?). I think more or less the
goal would be the same with current GSoC project if we extend the
definition of 'collection' to also contain data itself. So one colleciton
is
Just to add to the whole Qt5 webkit/webengine mess... it looks like
now QtWebKit is being revived:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-June/026156.html
and
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-June/026282.html
If this eventuates (and is reflected in the vari
Distros have not adopted this yet, beware of premature celebration.
QGIS will remain broken in Debian testing/unstable for the time being.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
__
Good to me, thanks Marco.
Il 19 giugno 2016 22:36:47 EEST, Marco Bernasocchi ha
scritto:
>
>
>On 19 June 2016 23:58:06 GMT+12:00, Alessandro Pasotti
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>"official" is better than "community" ?
>>
>>What is the preferred way?
>>
>>"Official" on the contrary sounds a lot like bureocra
Hi Akbar and Régis
Thanks for your answers.
2016-06-19 23:09 GMT+02:00 Akbar Gumbira :
> I just read your All-In-One Project Plugin documentation here (are you about
> to develop it? or already developed it?).
Development has been suspended in 2015 (similar but independently to
relocator, QConso
27 matches
Mail list logo