Re: [Qgis-developer] QtWebKit no longer deprecated!

2016-06-19 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Distros have not adopted this yet, beware of premature celebration. QGIS will remain broken in Debian testing/unstable for the time being. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

[Qgis-developer] QtWebKit no longer deprecated!

2016-06-19 Thread Nyall Dawson
Just to add to the whole Qt5 webkit/webengine mess... it looks like now QtWebKit is being revived: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-June/026156.html and http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-June/026282.html If this eventuates (and is reflected in the

Re: [Qgis-developer] Sharing 1. symbology (styles) and 2. projects incl. data and styles (GSoC, relocator, QConsolidate)

2016-06-19 Thread Akbar Gumbira
Hi Stefan, I just read your All-In-One Project Plugin documentation here (are you about to develop it? or already developed it?). I think more or less the goal would be the same with current GSoC project if we extend the definition of 'collection' to also contain data itself. So one colleciton is

Re: [Qgis-developer] Sharing 1. symbology (styles) and 2. projects incl. data and styles (GSoC, relocator, QConsolidate)

2016-06-19 Thread Akbar Gumbira
HI Stefan, I am the one doing that GSoC project. You remind me that I need to update the project description in osgeo wiki. The concept has changed a lot since then. We decided that we would go with sharing collections to a directory based repository (For now I will implement it for Github and

[Qgis-developer] Sharing 1. symbology (styles) and 2. projects incl. data and styles (GSoC, relocator, QConsolidate)

2016-06-19 Thread Stefan Keller
Hi, These are thoughts on sharing 1. a whole QGIS symbology and 2. a whole QGIS project including symbology and data. There's a promising current GSoC project, where users ("designers, cartographers") can << share QGIS style files >> incl. styles (.qml), symbols (.xml) and SVG markers. End users

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Marco Bernasocchi
On 19 June 2016 23:58:06 GMT+12:00, Alessandro Pasotti wrote: > > >"official" is better than "community" ? > >What is the preferred way? > >"Official" on the contrary sounds a lot like bureocracy to me. > I think "just" QGIS. The other versions dhould be referred as

Re: [Qgis-developer] What is the API for opening and displaying HDF5 files through native python console in QGIS?

2016-06-19 Thread Thomas Gratier
Hi, Just use the following from qgis.core import QgsRasterLayer layer = QgsRasterLayer(u"/your/path/your_hdf5_file") if (len(layer.subLayers()) > 1): sub_layer = QgsRasterLayer(layer.subLayers()[1], 'sub layer') # Choose arbitrarily the 2nd sub layer

Re: [Qgis-developer] The first column in the attribute table

2016-06-19 Thread Matthias Kuhn
Hi Andreas, Thanks for the feedback. Just a short note to avoid confusion: the number in old versions (<=2.14) was not the feature id. Matthias On 19/06/16 13:17, Andreas Neumann wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > Thank you for these fixes - it is now more intuitive for me than > before - and still

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Richard Duivenvoorde
On 19-06-16 13:59, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > Official is the right word to me. Yep, to me too, all others are ... non-offical :-) Richard ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Nathan Woodrow
Official is the right word to me. On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 9:58 pm Alessandro Pasotti wrote: > Oh, gosh sorry, didn't know how to call them to distinguish clearly, > forgive me! And as Andreas said, my personal feeling is that something > "Community" has no less value than

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Alessandro Pasotti
Oh, gosh sorry, didn't know how to call them to distinguish clearly, forgive me! And as Andreas said, my personal feeling is that something "Community" has no less value than anything else, on the contrary I value it more because it comes from a community instead of an individual or a company.

Re: [Qgis-developer] The first column in the attribute table

2016-06-19 Thread Andreas Neumann
Hi Matthias, Thank you for these fixes - it is now more intuitive for me than before - and still shows the internatl feature ID - should one dev or admin need it. Andreas On 17.06.2016 19:19, Matthias Kuhn wrote: Hi Andreas, as of today there's also the feature id shown in the tooltip of

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Andreas Neumann
Hi, I agree with Jürgen and Matthieu - "community version" has kind of a negative touch. Although the original replier (Alessandro) probably did not intend/imply this. The official version from QGIS.ORG shouldn't be called "community version" - it is the "offical version". Andreas On

[Qgis-developer] Report 4 - QGIS Symbology Sharing Tools

2016-06-19 Thread Akbar Gumbira
Hi All, I want to share the progress of QGIS Symbology Sharing Tool for the GSoC project. This tool will allow you to share collections (symbol, svgs, etc) in a repository, fetch it, and use it in QGIS. What did you get done this week? This week I worked on: *Handler Classes* Handler class is

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread G. Allegri
Ok, no problem with having "custom" versions. I wouldn't call "community version" the official one for the same reasons exposed by others. I'm only concerned for the rise of questions similar to this post, where users ask for support on custom versions with the serious risk of great confusion.

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi Mathieu, On Sun, 19. Jun 2016 at 15:57:05 +0700, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > Im not a huge fan of the "community version" terminology. Same here - where "community version" is used it's often describes a crippled version that is missing some functionality. Jürgen [5 (in words: five)

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi, On Sun, 19. Jun 2016 at 16:09:16 +0700, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Paolo Cavallini > wrote: > > Il 19 giugno 2016 11:22:16 EEST, Pieter du Plooy > > ha scritto: > > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Tom

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Mathieu Pellerin
Well, first of all, there is officially no such thing as a "community version" (you can google qgis.org's main domain and documentation, you won't find a single mention or use of that term). There's also precedents in the open source world (MySQL comes to mind here) where a legal entity does a

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Interesting. May I know why? All the best. Il 19 giugno 2016 11:22:16 EEST, Pieter du Plooy ha scritto: >Tom > >No, it will not do, as I specifically need the Boundless version. > >Thank you anyway > >On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Tom Chadwin

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Mathieu Pellerin
Im not a huge fan of the "community version" terminology. QGIS has an official version, found on qgis.org, and a number of flavors such as boundless :) On 19 Jun 2016 15:48, "Alessandro Pasotti" wrote: > It depends on what you mean with "fork", it is a fork in github sense

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Alessandro Pasotti
It depends on what you mean with "fork", it is a fork in github sense and it's here: https://github.com/boundlessgeo/QGIS Specifically: https://github.com/boundlessgeo/QGIS/tree/release-2_14-boundless The only differences are in the installer and in the particular commits that were included in

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread G. Allegri
What are differences between the Boundless and the official version? I thought they only made a plugin to integrate it within their suite of services. I didn't know it was a fork! Giovanni Il 19/giu/2016 10:22 AM, "Pieter du Plooy" ha scritto: > Tom > > No, it will not

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Pieter du Plooy
Tom No, it will not do, as I specifically need the Boundless version. Thank you anyway On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Tom Chadwin wrote: > Is http://qgis.org/downloads/ any use? > > Tom > > > > -- > View this message in context: >

Re: [Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Tom Chadwin
Is http://qgis.org/downloads/ any use? Tom -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Boundlessgeo-QGIS-tp5272336p5272339.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] Any plans for implementing vector tile generation on QGIS Server?

2016-06-19 Thread Marco Hugentobler
Hi Nikolai Oh sorry, was reading the mail in a rush and meant raster tiles. I don't have much experience with vector tiles. Afaik, they come without symbolisation? If yes, is there a reason why the vector tile serving needs to be inside QGIS server? Or could you just use another application

[Qgis-developer] Boundlessgeo QGIS

2016-06-19 Thread Pieter du Plooy
Hi guys Im posting this in the users and dev forums in the hope that someone who knows someone at Boundless reads this. I can contact them, but its probably out of normal hours, so will probably only get an answer tomorrow, and I need an answer quicker than that. I have been struggling in vain