Re: [QGIS-Developer] issues with 1:n relations

2018-04-17 Thread Matthias Kuhn
On 04/17/2018 10:28 PM, Nyall Dawson wrote: > On 18 April 2018 at 02:39, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >> Hi Giovanni >> >> On 04/17/2018 06:23 PM, Giovanni Manghi wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have recently had to test some scenario with 1:n relations in QGIS and I >> have found a

Re: [QGIS-Developer] issues in QGIS Server 2,18

2018-04-17 Thread Lorenzo Moretti
Hi In addition to the problem described in GetPrint I have a problem related to the legend in QGIS 2.18. If the "Show Feature Count" function is enabled my QGIS Server crashes and part of the qgs file is also compromised. The legend is no longer displayed. Even if disabled "Show Feature Count"

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Error with GRASS in Processing

2018-04-17 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 18 April 2018 at 04:38, Giovanni Manghi wrote: > Hi Nyall > >> It may not be right for the GRASS provider (it isn't - this is a bug), >> but for other providers it is, as this allows you to take advantage of >> Processing 3.0's new transparent reprojection. > >

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Error with GRASS in Processing

2018-04-17 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 17 April 2018 at 18:23, matteo wrote: > Hi devs, > > testing GRASS within Processing I noticed a small bug in all the > algorithms where you can add a map point coordinates with a click on the > map, like r.viewshed, r.drain > > If the users choose to click on the map

Re: [QGIS-Developer] issues with 1:n relations

2018-04-17 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 18 April 2018 at 02:39, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > > Hi Giovanni > > On 04/17/2018 06:23 PM, Giovanni Manghi wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have recently had to test some scenario with 1:n relations in QGIS and I > have found a few issues and would like to know if someone has them

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Error with GRASS in Processing

2018-04-17 Thread Giovanni Manghi
Hi Nyall > It may not be right for the GRASS provider (it isn't - this is a bug), > but for other providers it is, as this allows you to take advantage of > Processing 3.0's new transparent reprojection. right, I forgot about that. But then why not having the coordinates show in one field, and

Re: [QGIS-Developer] issues with 1:n relations

2018-04-17 Thread DelazJ
Hi, 2018-04-17 19:25 GMT+02:00 Raymond Nijssen : > Hi Giovanni, > > Not sure what you exactly did, I wasn't even aware of QGIS being able > doing any 1:n relations. > > Raymond,

Re: [QGIS-Developer] issues with 1:n relations

2018-04-17 Thread Raymond Nijssen
Hi Giovanni, Not sure what you exactly did, I wasn't even aware of QGIS being able doing any 1:n relations. But a few months ago I had to do a more complex 1:n relation, including adding some fields. I solved it by using a virtual layer. The description is here:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] issues with 1:n relations

2018-04-17 Thread Matthias Kuhn
Hi Giovanni On 04/17/2018 06:23 PM, Giovanni Manghi wrote: > Hi all, > > I have recently had to test some scenario with 1:n relations in QGIS > and I have found a few issues and would like to know if someone has > them in its pipeline/todo list, eventually to share the effort for the > fixes. > >

[QGIS-Developer] issues with 1:n relations

2018-04-17 Thread Giovanni Manghi
Hi all, I have recently had to test some scenario with 1:n relations in QGIS and I have found a few issues and would like to know if someone has them in its pipeline/todo list, eventually to share the effort for the fixes. Anyway I'm also interested on your feedback on the matter. 1) 1:n

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Error with GRASS in Processing

2018-04-17 Thread matteo
Hi Nyall, > It may not be right for the GRASS provider (it isn't - this is a bug), > but for other providers it is, as this allows you to take advantage of > Processing 3.0's new transparent reprojection. > > E.g.: > > - canvas in 3857 > - layers in 4326 > - run the shortest path

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Error with GRASS in Processing

2018-04-17 Thread matteo
Hi Giovanni, thanks for the answer. I was not sure if this error was reported somewhere. BTW, done: https://issues.qgis.org/issues/18737 Thanks Matteo ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info:

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Error with GRASS in Processing

2018-04-17 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 17 April 2018 at 21:26, Giovanni Manghi wrote: > Hi Matteo, > >> Should I fill a ticket? > > of course you should (for this case as for any other regression/bug as this) > this is not right, and if fact it wasn't ever the case (to have also > the CRS info when using

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Error with GRASS in Processing

2018-04-17 Thread Giovanni Manghi
Hi Matteo, > Should I fill a ticket? of course you should (for this case as for any other regression/bug as this) this is not right, and if fact it wasn't ever the case (to have also the CRS info when using the pick coordinate tool). thanks! -- G --

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Drill-down (cascading) forms in QGIS Value Relation Widgets crowdfunding

2018-04-17 Thread Matthias Kuhn
Hi Alessandro, Thanks a lot for these detailed insights! On 04/17/2018 12:44 PM, Alessandro Pasotti wrote: > Hi, > > I'll try to address all concerns in a single mail (what a challenge!) > > First I would like to say that everybody has access to a different set > of "average/typical users" and I

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Drill-down (cascading) forms in QGIS Value Relation Widgets crowdfunding

2018-04-17 Thread Alessandro Pasotti
Hi, I'll try to address all concerns in a single mail (what a challenge!) First I would like to say that everybody has access to a different set of "average/typical users" and I cannot claim any statistical relevance to the group of users I've been in touch with. But the user's feedback that

[QGIS-Developer] Error with GRASS in Processing

2018-04-17 Thread matteo
Hi devs, testing GRASS within Processing I noticed a small bug in all the algorithms where you can add a map point coordinates with a click on the map, like r.viewshed, r.drain If the users choose to click on the map to fill the box with the coordinates of the point, the box is filled with both

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [947] ImportEpanetInpFiles approval notification.

2018-04-17 Thread noreply
Plugin ImportEpanetInpFiles approval by zimbogisgeek. The plugin version "[947] ImportEpanetInpFiles 1.3" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/ImportEpanetInpFiles/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1444] Geodyn gemeente approval notification.

2018-04-17 Thread noreply
Plugin Geodyn gemeente approval by zimbogisgeek. The plugin version "[1444] Geodyn gemeente 0.4 Experimental" is now approved Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/GeodynGem/ ___ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: