Plugin BHCgeo approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1753] BHCgeo 0.1 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/bhcgeoqgis/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:
Hi devs!
I'm a junior developer and I'm working on a project trying to refresh an old
GISWEB, to do so i chose QWC2+QGISServer.
Actual setup is:
Debian 10, Apache2, QGIS-Server 3.8, using .shp as layers... the QWC2 works
fine, WMS works fine, i can print some templates, print png, etc...
The
On Tue, 23. Jul 2019 at 04:23:49 -0700, magerlin wrote:
> But it means that typically my GIS layers are stored at places like:
> \\files\Projects\11000382XX\1100038233\GIS\Layers\
> And I se no way of getting to there in the QGIS browser window?
You can add a favorite for that network path.
Ah - very fine. I had actually been looking for a way to manually add a path
-
Regards Morten
Currently using Qgis 2.18.23 (OSGeo4) and Qgis 3.8.0 in parallel
Windows 7, 64bit
--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 21:24, magerlin wrote:
>
> Where I work somebody decided to use sharepoint as our document handling
> system - I will save you for my opinion on that!
>
> But it means that typically my GIS layers are stored at places like:
>
Where I work somebody decided to use sharepoint as our document handling
system - I will save you for my opinion on that!
But it means that typically my GIS layers are stored at places like:
\\files\Projects\11000382XX\1100038233\GIS\Layers\
And I se no way of getting to there in the QGIS
Although my problem (or rather, our problem with Raymond) is similar but
not exactly the same:
Nope - it IS the same ;) You can see it in
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/30842
Yes, it's just there is more to it I think. I imagined a qgis with a
resource sharing system where we would not
On 2019-07-23 10:49, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
Is OTB PROJ 6 ready yet?
OTB doesn't link to libproj. The otb Debian package has a patch for GDAL
3.
See also the PROJ 6.0.0 [0], PROJ 6.1.1 [1] & GDAL 2.5.0 [2] threads on
the Debian GIS list.
[0]
Is OTB PROJ 6 ready yet?
On 7/23/19 11:23 AM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 23. Jul 2019 at 10:11:59 +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote:
Discussion welcome :)
What's the state of GRASS with PROJ 6?
Jürgen
___
grass-dev mailing list
On 2019-07-23 10:23, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
What's the state of GRASS with PROJ 6?
7.6.1 builds successfully when you define
ACCEPT_USE_OF_DEPRECATED_PROJ_API_H.
7.6.0 fails due to the removal of nad2bin in PROJ 6.
Kind Regards,
Bas
___
Hi,
On Tue, 23. Jul 2019 at 10:11:59 +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> Discussion welcome :)
What's the state of GRASS with PROJ 6?
Jürgen
--
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50
Hi all,
we also have interested customers, hopefully we'll be able to
contribute. I agree with the approach proposed by Gerald, which does not
seem very complicated. Perhaps an ad hoc funding for this will be
enough, without the need for a crowdfunding campaign?
Cheers.
On 23/07/19 09:28, Tim
On 2019-07-23 09:35, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
For reference, in Debian Sid proj6 and gdal3 are still in
experimental.
And GDAL 3 is staying there at least until fiona supports it.
Kind Regards,
Bas
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
Hi Nyall,
On 23/07/19 02:11, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> Discussion welcome :)
I'm in favour of switching. The only issue I see is with LTR, where a
regression would be very bad. Probably better to put out experimental
packages and call for ad hoc testing before publishing an official point
release.
Great, will do thanks Gerald.
Regards
Tim
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, 22:35 Gerald Kogler, wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Thanks for your info, please let us know when you start the crowdfunding
> campaign to gather funds for advanced metadata support.
>
> We have two clients interested in this feature and we
15 matches
Mail list logo
