Re: [QGIS-Developer] WKT from QgsGeometry incompatible with OGR

2024-07-06 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer
Hi Even, I already saw your PR. It is really nice to all our tools talking smoothly to each other. Thanks for the improvement. Seems like quite easy to change QGIS code. The major impact are these 15 tests:     227 - test_core_geometry_circularstring (Failed)     228 - test_core_geo

Re: [QGIS-Developer] WKT from QgsGeometry incompatible with OGR

2024-07-06 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer
Hi Nyall, I would say that the focus (on the examples in 6.1.2.6.4) is the LocateAlong and LocateBetween methods and the examples used are less carefully written. Next to each other, examples on 6.1.2.6.3 and 6.1.2.6.4 seem written by different contributors. Page 52 says: "The Well-known Tex

Re: [QGIS-Developer] WKT from QgsGeometry incompatible with OGR

2024-07-06 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer
Hi, I second Even argument and I would prefer to change QGIS implementation. It does not make sense to have QGIS WKT strings not compatible with other Python tools (based on GEOS/JTS, like shapely, for example) and ogr. >>> import shapely >>> shapely.to_wkt(shapely.Point(0, 0, 0)) 'POINT Z (0

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Maintainance of QGIS Plugin repository

2024-05-02 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer
PM Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer wrote: Hi Admire, Thank you for helping with the plugins. I think we can lower the administration time, if we can enable reviews by the users. Not just voting (that we already have), but written reviews. Written reviews can ad

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Maintainance of QGIS Plugin repository

2024-04-30 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer
Hi Admire, Thank you for helping with the plugins. I think we can lower the administration time, if we can enable reviews by the users. Not just voting (that we already have), but written reviews. Written reviews can address issues you mentioned: - Duplication of functionality. Plugin functi

Re: [QGIS-Developer] qgis.org/ubuntugis down or not responding

2024-04-21 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer
Thank you! On April 21, 2024 13:50:15 GMT+01:00, "Jürgen E. Fischer via QGIS-Developer" wrote: >Hi Jorge, > >On Sun, 21. Apr 2024 at 12:22:35 +0100, Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer >wrote: >> QGIS repos, like https://qgis.org/ubuntu or https://qgis.org/ubu

[QGIS-Developer] qgis.org/ubuntugis down or not responding

2024-04-21 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer
Hi, QGIS repos, like https://qgis.org/ubuntu or https://qgis.org/ubuntugis are not responding. The connection ends at cloudfare.com with timeout error. Is it a problem on QGIS servers side or some cloudfare temporary issue? Regards, Jorge ___ QGIS

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Question about missing WMS TIME parameter in the documentation

2024-03-27 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer
Hi Selma, Thank for the feedback. Seems like this TIME parameter never landed in the documentation. I'll continue the discussion on top of the existent issue https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues/7622 Regards, Jorge On 27/03/24 15:41, Selma Vidimlic wrote: Hello Jorge, Than

[QGIS-Developer] Question about missing WMS TIME parameter in the documentation

2024-03-27 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer
Hi Selma, Thank you for the excellent work with the documentation. I was checking QGIS Server documentation and the WMS parameter TIME is not mentioned. The parameter is still valid and WMS queries can use TIME parameter, but there is no reference to it in the documentation. I think it was

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Unable to build master on Ubuntu 22.04

2022-08-24 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer
Hi Harrissou, Recently our PDAL friends introduced in CMakeLists.txt: set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 17) set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED ON) For those compiling PDAL + GDAL + QGIS, maybe we need to use gcc-11. Is this you case? Building QGIS and all required software works on my 22.04 (with gcc-11).