Hi Alexander
Ok, that sounds reasonable to me (new class in core directory). In that
case, the new class has a similar role for scales as QgsTolerance has
for snap distances.
P.S. we can move this discussion do the developers list if necessary.
done.
Thanks,
Marco
Am 16.07.2012 10:28,
Hi,
Thanks Alexander for developping the idea underneath my patch. Allowing the
user to define the default Qgis scale lists is the right way to go. And we
will be able to have a "scale list repository", as python snippets codes.
I have another related idea. It could be good to have a project opti
I just pushed to my fork [0] implementation for scales import/export.
If there are no objections, I'll merge it to master soon.
[0] https://github.com/alexbruy/Quantum-GIS/tree/project_scale
--
Alexander Bruy
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-develo
Hi all,
I've pushed this feature to master.
Now project scales can be modified from Settings-Options-Map tools
(global setting) or in project properties (overrides global settings). Also
project setting can be temporarily disabled using checkbox.
--
Alexander Bruy
__
Sounds great.
Would be ideal if web-client uses the project defined scales!
Greetings
Denis
On 07/18/2012 09:50 AM, Alexander Bruy wrote:
Hi all,
I've pushed this feature to master.
Now project scales can be modified from Settings-Options-Map tools
(global setting) or in project properties
Denis,
In LizMap you can define the scales for your web LizMap project
But with the master, we can reused or override the scales.
René-Luc
Le 18/07/2012 09:53, Denis Rouzaud a écrit :
Sounds great.
Would be ideal if web-client uses the project defined scales!
Greetings
Denis
On 07/18/201
Hi Denis
Together with Andreas, we are currently thinking about an additional way
of passing server capabilities to the webclient (something more specific
than WMS capabilities). Scales defined in the project could also be part
of it.
Regards,
Marco
Am 18.07.2012 09:53, schrieb Denis Rouzau
Woul be great I think.
The less you have to specify in the client part, the better it is (I think).
On 07/18/2012 10:05 AM, Marco Hugentobler wrote:
Hi Denis
Together with Andreas, we are currently thinking about an additional
way of passing server capabilities to the webclient (something m
