Hi Martin,
glad that I could had helped you ;)
Cheers
Matteo
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-de
Hello,
my question was answered at the QGIS hackfest by Matteo Ghetta with a
DataPlotly code snippet. (-: You can add your own entries into the
"Processing Settings" menu under the "Providers" section by following the
example below in your own Provider class.
from processing.core.ProcessingConfig
Hello,
when the LAStools toolboxes were part of the "built-in" scripts of
Processing I had was able to have two entries (i.e. the folder path to the
"Wine" and the "LAStools" installation) in the "Processing Settings" menu
under the "Providers" section. You can see as an example how GRASS still
ha
Hi Martin,
It is up to you how to distribute your plugin. You can publish it in
QGIS Official
plugins repository, or setup your own repository as many other developers do.
It is even possible to share just a ZIP with the plugin via web-site,
pretty much
similar to how LAStools distributed.
чт, 23
you can add a simple plugin hosted in the official repo to add your custon
plugin repo or a plugin that simplify installation. I agree with that who
assume that offial repo have to host plugin with code compatible with GPL2.
A plugin that install a plugin can simply override this limitation without
Hello Alex,
all the python code is pretty much written. Victor even did some kind of
port already.
https://github.com/volaya/qgis-lidartools-plugin
But I am struggling with how to add this code as a plugin such it can be
searched for. Maybe I should provide it as a zip package ("Install from
ZIP
Hi Martin,
there are a lot of Processing providers which are not part of the QGIS
core. You can easily find
some of them in the QGIS Plugin repository by "Processing" keyword.
Also in QGIS sources
there is an example provider which can be used as staring point, see
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/tre
Hello from Zanzibar,
In the next three days I'd like to tackle recreating the LAStools toolbox
the way it was available in QGIS 2.4 through 2.18 to also in QGIS 3.2. Is
there a guide / example that I can follow to provide the LiDAR tools
provider as a separate plugin as we've discussed it previou
Martin
That might be my fault. I mentioned that, by having the LiDAR tools
provider as a separate plugin, that allows to ship the tools with it
(not with QGIS, but with the plugin itself, which you will manage and
release whenever you want). Of course, you can still provide the
downloads from your
Hello,
One thing to keep in mind is that not all the LIDAR tools are open sources,
> 2/3 of the LAStools aren't and slightly distort the output after certain
> point limits are exceeded. My opinion is that QGIS shouldn't ship or assist
> the distribution of closed binaries.
Not sure who suggeste
Is anyone working towards fully open source LIDAR tools that could replace
LAStools?
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:51 AM, wrote:
> Le 2017-01-30 19:24, Victor Olaya a écrit :
>
>> One good thing that we have been discussing, related to this move, is
>> that for LiDAR tools, it should be possible to h
Le 2017-01-30 19:24, Victor Olaya a écrit :
One good thing that we have been discussing, related to this move, is
that for LiDAR tools, it should be possible to have a plugin that has
not just the code of the Processign provider, but the binaries as
well, so installing the plugin would add the al
veloper] OTB and LiDAR tools as separate plugins
Hi all,
I have set up the OTB and LiDAR tools Processing provider as separate plugins,
each of them in its own repo. The idea is to have those providers that require
3rd party apps outside of the core Processing, so they can be installed
se
AFAIK, OTB version in OSGeo4W is very outdated (5.0 if I'm not wrong).
Right now latest version is 5.8 and OTB team is working on 5.10.
I think having OTB provider separated from core will allow to update it
faster and also support more OTB features like special parameters types.
2017-01-30 20:28
Il 30/01/2017 18:24, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
> I think we are not shipping them. OTB is available in OSGeo4W, but not
> in the standalone installers, if I am right
in 32 bit OTB it is present
agreed, very interesting and useful discussion
all the best
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS
2017-01-30 19:00 GMT+01:00 Paolo Cavallini :
> Il 30/01/2017 14:27, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
>
>> If you have any comment, please let us know.
>
> Thanks Victor. I think this is a good improvement, giving OTB and
> LASTools more flexibility to update new versions.
> One thing that worries me is: we
Il 30/01/2017 14:27, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
> If you have any comment, please let us know.
Thanks Victor. I think this is a good improvement, giving OTB and
LASTools more flexibility to update new versions.
One thing that worries me is: we are shipping OTB and LASTools at least
in Windows packa
Hi all,
I have set up the OTB and LiDAR tools Processing provider as separate
plugins, each of them in its own repo. The idea is to have those
providers that require 3rd party apps outside of the core Processing,
so they can be installed separately and managed independently. Alex
Bruy already did
18 matches
Mail list logo
