On 06/20/2014 01:33 AM, Luca Manganelli wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Martin Dobias wrote:
>> I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
>> There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
>> I would suggest max. 7 days (without affecting the
Hi
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Jürgen E. wrote:
>
> Please keep on testing for the coming week as I going to postpone until next
> friday.
Thanks for that!
> Maybe we should extent the testing phase to six weeks and use only 10 weeks
> for
> development for 2.6 (or 10+5 or 9+6 weeks, as w
Thanks Jurgen.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Jürgen E. wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Fri, 20. Jun 2014 at 14:43:22 +0700, Martin Dobias wrote:
> > I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
> > There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
> > I wo
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 20. Jun 2014 at 14:43:22 +0700, Martin Dobias wrote:
> I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
> There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
> I would suggest max. 7 days (without affecting the schedule of the
> next release).
+1
On 06/20/2014 10:43 AM, Martin Dobias wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
I would propose to have two more weeks for stabilizing things.
Yesterday we had the Swiss QGIS user meeting. We had workshops with QGIS
master. While the features are great, there were
On 20/06/2014 5:43 pm, "Martin Dobias" wrote:
>
> I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
> There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
> I would suggest max. 7 days (without affecting the schedule of the
> next release).
>
If Martin thinks we s
+1
Best regards,
Pedro Venâncio
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
+1
giovanni
Il 20/giu/2014 10:39 "Luca Delucchi" ha scritto:
> On 20 June 2014 10:33, Luca Manganelli wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Martin Dobias
> wrote:
> >> I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
> >> There is still quite steady flow of new bug repor
On 20 June 2014 10:33, Luca Manganelli wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Martin Dobias wrote:
>> I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
>> There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
>> I would suggest max. 7 days (without affecting the
+1
2014-06-20 10:33 GMT+02:00 Luca Manganelli :
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Martin Dobias
> wrote:
> > I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
> > There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
> > I would suggest max. 7 days (without affe
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Martin Dobias wrote:
> I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
> There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
> I would suggest max. 7 days (without affecting the schedule of the
> next release).
+1. Stability of
Hi
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> I would propose to have two more weeks for stabilizing things.
>
> Yesterday we had the Swiss QGIS user meeting. We had workshops with QGIS
> master. While the features are great, there were still some issues that
> need to be address
Hi,
I hate to be the one asking for it - but I think we need more time for
testing and bugfixing.
We have a very good release feature wise - but there are still a number
of rather severe or annoying bugs to fix (some of them haven't even been
reported yet).
One month is not enough time for testi
13 matches
Mail list logo