Il 21/09/2015 10:35, Filipe Dias ha scritto:
> If the sponsors are not interested in financing Processing, then
> crowdfunding would be a nice alternative. I would certainly be willing
> to contribute.
Agreed. The first issue is to find a developer interested in doing this,
and opening the
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Filipe Dias wrote:
> Despite the lack of financial investment QGIS-Processing is, in my
> opinion, the best tool for GIS analysis in the market (including paid
> software). However there are a few problems (like the one mentioned above)
>
Hi,
Despite the lack of financial investment QGIS-Processing is, in my opinion,
the best tool for GIS analysis in the market (including paid software).
However there are a few problems (like the one mentioned above) that can
discourage new users and ruin user experience.
I think some paid
Hi,
I'd like to draw some attention to a really nasty OGR issue/regression
which makes it impossible to use OGR algos in models:
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/13174
In general, this is kind of a follow upon of the thread "GRASS missing from
Processing?" where Paolo summarized:
On Fri, Sep 18,