Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-12 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 12/10/2016 14:20, René-Luc Dhont ha scritto: > Hi devs, > > I have updated the QEP: Thanks René. Should we wait until all the pieces are defined, or should a crowdfunding start piece by piece? I think having a general picture first would be good, but on the other hand starting with

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-12 Thread René-Luc Dhont
Hi devs, I have updated the QEP: * the title made by David * the list of qgis3.0_api issues https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74 I have found 5 already opened qgis3.0_api issues link to QGIS server enhancement. * QgsProject is a singleton #8 * Map Layers and

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-12 Thread Marco Hugentobler
Hi I agree with Andreas that there is no need to hurry. It is much easier to plan once the Project / MapLayerRegistry redesign has been done. The plans with server services as plugins are nice, and people can work at it while the Project / MapLayerRegistry refactoring is going on. It is

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-12 Thread Neumann, Andreas
I think it needs a core dev familiar on the code base (specifically server situation) to decide what needs to be done under the hood. I propose to ask Marco Hugentobler to take a technical lead on this, since he started QGIS server and should be familiar with the issues. Other devs can of course

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-12 Thread David Marteau
Ok for the renaming. > Le 12 oct. 2016 à 10:04, Neumann, Andreas a écrit : > > Hi, > > Yes - that seems a good place to do the discussions. > > Maybe the title of the QEP can be renamed to "QGIS server code refactoring > for QGIS 3.0" - or something similar. And the

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-12 Thread David Marteau
Naturally, I volonteer for help. > Le 12 oct. 2016 à 10:07, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : > > Il 12/10/2016 09:56, David Marteau ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> There a QEP about the refactoring of the server that already addresses some >> issues:

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-12 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 12/10/2016 09:56, David Marteau ha scritto: > Hi, > > There a QEP about the refactoring of the server that already addresses some > issues: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74, could > it fit as a starting point ? Thanks everybody for comments. I agree we should

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-12 Thread David Marteau
Hi, There a QEP about the refactoring of the server that already addresses some issues: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74, could it fit as a starting point ? > Le 12 oct. 2016 à 09:42, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : > > Il 12/10/2016 09:26,

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-12 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 12/10/2016 09:26, Neumann, Andreas ha scritto: > Lets spend some time first, to collect all the requirements before we do > any further actions. I think in this situation a QEP, describing what to > do in what order, makes a lot of sense. After that we can look into who > could do what.

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-12 Thread Neumann, Andreas
Hi Paolo / Tudor, I agree that the QGIS server improvements should be started. But you need a clear plan on what to do in what order. Requirements need to go first, otherwise there is no point in selecting devs, getting quotes/estimates and doing a crowd-funding. And probably, several devs will

Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-12 Thread Tudor Barascu
Hi Paolo, A big thumbs up! All the best,Tudor On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 8:28 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Hi all, after a first bloom of interest around the improvement/rewrite of qgis server, things seem stagnant nowadays. I suggest therefore to: * select

[Qgis-developer] QGIS server improvements

2016-10-11 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Hi all, after a first bloom of interest around the improvement/rewrite of qgis server, things seem stagnant nowadays. I suggest therefore to: * select one or more suitable developers * obtain an estimate * start a crowdfunding. Given the number of interested firms and individuals, I think it