Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

I was talking about that proposition: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Merging-of-incompatible-changes-td5010325.html ( specifically the part about using the new api, as explained here : http://pyqt.sourceforge.net/Docs/PyQt4/incompatible_apis.html ) 2013/3/20 Tim Sutton > Hi > > On Wed, M

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Olivier Dalang wrote: > Hi ! > > Just for information : > - will QGis 2.0 have the PyQt API changed to version 2 ? I don't understand? > - will it have a separate plugin folder than QGis 1.8 ? It would probably make sense for it to have a separate plugin fol

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi ! Just for information : - will QGis 2.0 have the PyQt API changed to version 2 ? - will it have a separate plugin folder than QGis 1.8 ? Thanks ! Olivier 2013/3/15 Tim Sutton > Hi All > > Just to confirm on this thread that following the discussions here the > following updated timeline

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi All Just to confirm on this thread that following the discussions here the following updated timeline to 2.0 will apply: 1 April 2013 - Feature freeze - no new features in master 1 May 2013 - GUI Freeze and String freeze - no changes to ui or strings except where required for critical bug fixe

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Pushed to master branch now. On 13.03.2013 17:44, Marco Hugentobler wrote: Hi devs The first part of the symbology improvements is available in my github fork: https://github.com/mhugent/Quantum-GIS/tree/data_defined_symbology Currently, one symbol is either in mm or in map units. The chang

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi devs The first part of the symbology improvements is available in my github fork: https://github.com/mhugent/Quantum-GIS/tree/data_defined_symbology Currently, one symbol is either in mm or in map units. The changeset in the branch adds the possibility to mix different output units ( mm / m

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi On 03/04/2013 08:17 PM, Larry Shaffer wrote: Hi, On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Tim Sutton > wrote: Hi On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Radim Blazek mailto:radim.bla...@gmail.com>> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Matthias Kuhn mail

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

2013/3/5 Matthias Kuhn : > On 03/05/2013 08:06 AM, Alexander Bruy wrote: > > Diagrams should be ready for 2.0. The code has been merged about half a year > ago. Yes, I know. But old implementation also still available. -- Alexander Bruy ___ Qgis-develo

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

The new diagrams engine is solid, working better than the old one in all the scenarios I've met. It's only weakness is that it doesn't play well with the PAL engine. M On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > On 03/05/2013 08:06 AM, Alexander Bruy wrote: > >> On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 0

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

On 03/05/2013 08:06 AM, Alexander Bruy wrote: On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 01:28:30 +0100 Martin Dobias wrote: I would also like to finally remove old symbology - whether being fully replaced by features in new symbology or not - otherwise we will need to live the whole 2.x release cycle with old symbol

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 01:28:30 +0100 Martin Dobias wrote: > I would also like to finally remove old symbology - whether being fully > replaced by features in new symbology or not - otherwise we will need to > live the whole 2.x release cycle with old symbology. But what about other duplicate things

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

On Mar 4, 2013 8:17 PM, "Larry Shaffer" wrote: > +1 for April 1 as a general feature freeze date, i.e. not for any specific feature. I believe that's enough time to finish some of the labeling features I've been wanting to focus on for 2.0. If someone could help out with optimizing PAL for speed,

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi, On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Tim Sutton wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Radim Blazek > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Matthias Kuhn > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I appreciate that a release plan is finally getting published and the > way > >> for a shiny 2.0 i

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi, We have the (german speaking) FOSSGIS 2013 conference in Switzerland from June 12 to 14 - would be kind of nice if we could announce QGIS 2.0 there (http://www.fossgis.de/konferenz/2013/). I agree that data-defined symbology and raster improvements should be finished. The relations manag

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Radim Blazek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I appreciate that a release plan is finally getting published and the way >> for a shiny 2.0 is being paved. >> >> I'm currently working on relation enhancements and nested

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Moving the date to say start of April wouldn't hurt. Would that help? Start of April would be ok for the data defined symbology. Regards, Marco On 04.03.2013 11:44, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: Hi Marco, On Mon, 04. Mar 2013 at 11:37:15 +0100, Marco Hugentobler wrote: Disadvantage is that 15 M

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 04/03/2013 12:52, Radim Blazek ha scritto: > It seems that 2 weeks to finish all works won't be sufficient. How about planning a 2.1 release shortly after June, where all this job could fit in? I know it's imposing an additional strain on the who

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 04/03/2013 12:52, Radim Blazek ha scritto: > It seems that 2 weeks to finish all works won't be sufficient. How about planning a 2.1 release shortly after June, where all this job could fit in? I know it's imposing an additional strain on the who

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

I agree with Radim we need to start calling this much early then this. 2 or 3 months should be fine but I also think that we should have a more planned out release time. This way people know it is coming +/- a month or so. - Nathan On 4 Mar 2013 21:52, "Radim Blazek" wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 201

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > Hi, > > I appreciate that a release plan is finally getting published and the way > for a shiny 2.0 is being paved. > > I'm currently working on relation enhancements and nested forms for related > features. Unfortunately, this branch will no

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi, I appreciate that a release plan is finally getting published and the way for a shiny 2.0 is being paved. I'm currently working on relation enhancements and nested forms for related features. Unfortunately, this branch will not be ready by March 15, but I know, that there are some people

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi Marco, On Mon, 04. Mar 2013 at 11:37:15 +0100, Marco Hugentobler wrote: > Disadvantage is that 15 March is too close for it to go into master. What > should we do (wait for 2.1 / shift feature freeze date / exception from > feature freeze) ? How much time would you need? Moving the date to s

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 04/03/2013 11:37, Marco Hugentobler ha scritto: > For symbology migration from old to new one, I have good news: thanks to a > project > from Uster and Jena, I can implement data defined symbology settings for new > symbology. It is one of the few

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi Tim The release plan sounds good to me (especially the longer bug fix period). I don't know however if 15 March is a bit close for feature freeze (at least for me, see below). >Things we planned to fix for 2.0 that still need love are, IMHO: >* general interface cleanup >* symbology migrat

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 03/03/2013 13:58, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto: > Paolo, > > I had the idea of using the vertical list of icons on the left, one for each > provider, and having the current providers widget/dialog that opens normally > when you > press the button doc

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Paolo, I had the idea of using the vertical list of icons on the left, one for each provider, and having the current providers widget/dialog that opens normally when you press the button docked on the right. This would mean the UI is more consistent with the other dialog that follow this style an

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

>* symbology migration to the new one >* labelling migration to the new one related issues are here http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Switching_from_Old_to_New_Symbology_and_Labeling Would not be also great to fix issue that are known to cause crashes or data corruption, but are not no

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 03/03/2013 11:33, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto: > add vector layer stuff is starting to really get out of hand. I would like > to use > the vertical tab idea and just have one dialog. I had bigger plans for the > dialog > but don't have time curre

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

As much as a consistent UI is great and we should always aim for that stability is much more important. We can fix the UI between 2.0 and 2.1 but releasing something unstable really leaves a bad taste in peoples mouth. Having said that the add vector layer stuff is starting to really get out of h

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Hi, On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Borys Jurgiel wrote: > Dnia sobota, 2 marca 2013 o 22:15:41 Tim Sutton napisał(a): > > Hi All > > > > I would like to get 2.0 release process rolling - I think all the key > > features we were after have made their way into master and those that > > haven't ca

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

Dnia sobota, 2 marca 2013 o 22:15:41 Tim Sutton napisał(a): > Hi All > > I would like to get 2.0 release process rolling - I think all the key > features we were after have made their way into master and those that > haven't can probably wait for 2.1. Unless there is vigorous and > widespread obje

Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze commencing the ides of March

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 02/03/2013 22:15, Tim Sutton ha scritto: > I would like to get 2.0 release process rolling - I think all the key > features we were after have made their way into master and those that > haven't can probably wait for 2.1. Unless there is vigorous a