Thank you for posting here, Alexander. Sending prayers for you and your
countrymen.
Ari
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 10:55 PM Alexander Bruy
wrote:
> Thanks Markus and all those who support us and have bravery to name
> things with their real names.
>
> For those who want to make business as usual e
I do agree that such a boycott is problematic, in the same way that
boycotting apolitical Chinese organizations for China's crimes against
humanity is problematic. But I do agree with Markus that Russia's actions
here are abominable. I think a reasonable compromise, FWIW, could be that
Russian QG
That's very helpful, John -- thanks!
Ari
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 3:01 AM John Layt wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 07:56, Richard Duivenvoorde
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/20/22 08:53, Ari Meyer wrote:
>> > Another question: where do we find the release notes for builds
Thanks, Richard!
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 1:56 AM Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
> On 1/20/22 08:53, Ari Meyer wrote:
> > Another question: where do we find the release notes for builds like
> 3.16.16? I only see
> https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelogs
s
in https://qgis.org/downloads/ .
Best,
Ari
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:50 AM Andrea Giudiceandrea
wrote:
> Ari Meyer
> <https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org&q=from:%22Ari+Meyer%22>
> Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:24:14 -0800
> <https://www.mail-archive.com
>From looking at
https://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/development/roadmap.html#location-of-prereleases-nightly-builds
, am I interpreting this correctly to mean that 3.22.4 will become the next
LTR next month? If so, what happens to 3.16 LTR at that point?
Thanks,
Ari
s request.
>
> Nicolas Cadieux
> https://gitlab.com/njacadieux
>
> Le 18 janv. 2022 à 20:14, Ari Meyer a écrit :
>
>
> Just a question, given the discussion here. Shouldn't such a report be
> generated in a structured format like YAML/JSON/XML for easier parsing?
> Wo
Just a question, given the discussion here. Shouldn't such a report be
generated in a structured format like YAML/JSON/XML for easier parsing?
Would this merit an enhancement request?
Ari
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:54 PM chris hermansen
wrote:
> Nicolás, Igor and list,
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022,
Code see if it makes any difference with the Pylance language
server?
Thanks,
Ari
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:21 AM Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
> On 12/17/21 02:05, Ari Meyer wrote:
> >
> > I do not see any *.pyi files in my 3.16.9
> LTR's C:\OSGeo4W\apps\qgis-ltr\python\qgis d
point to those (I think because else they do not have enough
> information).
> Also with PyCharm it is a lot of fiddling, but in the end it just works.
>
> IF you manage to make it work: let's write it down somewhere!
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard Duivenvoorde
>
> On 12/16/21 0
Hi,
We've been trying to use VS Code Python type checkers to reduce errors, and
leverage Intellisense for code completion. We've been unable to get these
to work with PyQGIS and PyQT classes, for instance:
[image: image.png]
I believe I've traced the problem to some customized importing that's
Will do, Luca. Grazie!
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:09 AM Luca Manganelli <
luca.mangane...@comune.trento.it> wrote:
> Il giorno ven 20 ago 2021 alle ore 00:25 Ari Meyer
> ha scritto:
> >> A couple minor enhancements I wanted to propose for discussion (I
> wasn'
Forgot to add PYTHON VERSION to the list of items for Help->About. Very
important especially now that V1 (old) installed QGIS 3.16 LTRs still use
Python 3.7 vs. 3.9 for V2 (new) installations.
Thanks,
Ari
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 5:09 PM Ari Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A couple minor en
Hi,
A couple minor enhancements I wanted to propose for discussion (I wasn't
sure if I should create new github issues at this time):
1. Add info to Help->About for:
1. OSGeo Home/root directory -- I have multiple QGIS versions on my
laptop, so it would be nice to have a quick sani
Hi Jurgen,
I think the instructions at least should be changed to make it less
confusing. I think most importantly that the additional dependencies that
define "full" should be made explicit on the download page.
With the advanced installer, I wonder if "full" serves any purpose, as you
generall
Right. So for the V1 (old) installer we should use "qgis-ltr-full" like it
says, but for V2 (new) we should only specify "qgis-ltr"?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 3:21 AM Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> Hi Ari,
>
> On Mon, 16. Aug 2021 at 16:30:07 -0500, Ari Meyer wrote:
&g
2021 at 3:54 AM Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> Hi Ari,
>
> On Fri, 13. Aug 2021 at 21:07:40 -0500, Ari Meyer wrote:
> > One thing that is still unclear to me is the difference between the
> > qgis-*full* distributions and the corresponding builds that aren't
> "full
One thing that is still unclear to me is the difference between the
qgis-*full* distributions and the corresponding builds that aren't "full".
Here is the only thing I could find (very old):
https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/192978/installing-qgis-ltr-or-qgis-ltr-full-with-osgeo4w-or-both
, b
Thanks for the info, Jurgen. I will pass this on to my team.
Cheers!
Ari
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 10:12 AM Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> Hi Ari,
>
> On Thu, 12. Aug 2021 at 17:06:02 -0500, Ari Meyer wrote:
> > Thank you, Jurgen -- that trick did the job. Is this "fix"
I did install that as well, and
it worked, but it came with the old dependencies and Python 3.7, so I was
hoping to get a solution with the new repo.
Best,
Ari
Hi Ari,
On Wed, 11. Aug 2021 at 17:16:35 -0500, Ari Meyer wrote:
> Test with python-qgis-ltr.bat:
> Python 3.9.5 (tags/v3.9.5:0a7dc
Hi,
I mistakenly posted this to the Nabble list just before it got shut down.
I wrote (adding some specifics):
There were clearly major changes in 3.16.8+ LTR compared with the older
3.16.x and 3.18.y (apparently to bring it in line with 3.20+). We have had
problems with the new LTR versions whe
21 matches
Mail list logo