Hi
I just received a confirmation that Marco is working on a fix for this
issue and targets the 2.14 release.
GDAL 2.0 would still be nice to also have the geometry issue fixed :)
Best regards
--
Matthias Kuhn
OPENGIS.ch - https://www.opengis.ch
Spatial • (Q)GIS • PostGIS • Open Source
sig
Hi Matthias,
On Wed, 20. Jan 2016 at 11:30:07 +0100, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> This behavior is restored since 2.10 (internally there's a
> `dataChanged()` signal sent around to notify interested parties that all
> feature id caches need to be cleared).
> GDAL 2.0 should fix an issue with repack and
On 01/20/2016 11:14 AM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Wed, 20. Jan 2016 at 09:04:52 +0100, Neumann, Andreas wrote:
>> I also remember that Marco Hugentobler (Sourcepole) was contracted to
>> fix these Shapefile issues for the province of Vorarlberg - though I may
>> be wrong. So t
Le mercredi 20 janvier 2016 11:14:49, Jürgen E. Fischer a écrit :
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Wed, 20. Jan 2016 at 09:04:52 +0100, Neumann, Andreas wrote:
> > I also remember that Marco Hugentobler (Sourcepole) was contracted to
> > fix these Shapefile issues for the province of Vorarlberg - though I may
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 20. Jan 2016 at 09:04:52 +0100, Neumann, Andreas wrote:
> I also remember that Marco Hugentobler (Sourcepole) was contracted to
> fix these Shapefile issues for the province of Vorarlberg - though I may
> be wrong. So there is already someone investing to fix this bug. Marco -
me, money).
> > >
> > > The project steering committee is committed to resolving the bugs and
> > > they have already allocated a big proportion of their income for bug
> > > fixing. You can see last year's financial report hear:
> > >
> > &g
ial report hear:
> >
> > http://qgis.org/en/_downloads/PublicQGISfinancialreport2014.pdf
> >
> > If you think, there should be more work done to increase the quality of
> > QGIS, you can get involved or contribute to the project:
> >
> > http://qgis.org/en/site
Uwe - thanks for raising this issue it is important that attention is drawn
to important issues.
I have experienced issues with purchased products as well though.
I still consider QGIS to be an outstanding program and linked through to
databases I have experienced no issues with the LTR release.
contribute to the project:
>
> http://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/sponsorship/sponsorship.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Saber
>
> FROM: Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] ON BEHALF OF Uwe
> Fischer
> SENT: 19 January 2016 19:10
> TO: '
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> If you think, there should be more work done to increase the quality of
>> QGIS, you can get involved or contribute to the project:
>>
>>
>> http://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/sponsorship/sponsorship.html
Il 20/01/2016 07:31, gisfi...@t-online.de ha scritto:
> In principle, I agree to support QGIS development as a sponsor. But i
> think that it makes sense only if the very fundamental things like
> reliabilty in editing the world's most used geographic data format have
> the highest priority in the
Dear Uwe,
shape-file format is a proprietary format and we sometimes observe that
huge shape-files perform better (faster) in ESRI software.
I work a lot with shape-files, but the problem you describe I never had.
If you have ArcGIS license you can manipulate the shape-file there. If
you don't
vernance/sponsorship/sponsorship.html
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Saber
>
>
>
> *From:*Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org>] *On Behalf Of *Uwe Fischer
> *Sent:* 19
y in
editing the world's most used geographic data format have the highest
priority in the project. Yet, I cannot see if this is the case.
Regards, Uwe
-Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: RE: [Qgis-user] QGIS big fail in deleting Shapes!!
Datum: 2016-01-19T22:15:04+0100
Von: &q
gis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/sponsorship/sponsorship.html
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Saber
>
>
>
> *From:* Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Uwe Fischer
> *Sent:* 19 January 2016 19:10
> *To:* 'qgis-user ML'
> *Su
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Saber Razmjooei <
saber.razmjo...@lutraconsulting.co.uk> wrote:
> In general, QGIS and other GIS/non-GIS proprietary software come with
> bugs. The reason developers haven’t fixed this bug and other bugs is due to
> lack of resources (time, money).
Proprietary so
contribute to the project:
http://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/sponsorship/sponsorship.html
Regards,
Saber
From: Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Uwe
Fischer
Sent: 19 January 2016 19:10
To: 'qgis-user ML'
Subject: [Qgis-user] QGIS
Hi,
Generally speaking, if you save yours edits regularly, you should not have
problems. You should also save multiple version of the same files with varying
naming conventions as good practice.
Remember that closing or saving a project will not save your edits. You
must specifically save the
Hello all,
today I was working on a shape dataset and I had to delete some features.
Later I opened the shapefile in ArcMap by chance and I found that the
features were not deleted. They still did exist. I repeated the process -
and got the same result. Then, searching the internet, I found thi
19 matches
Mail list logo
