On Nov 3, 2007, at 11:39 PM, Tom Elwertowski wrote:
> John C. Tull wrote:
>> In order to checkout and build the advanced editing branch, do you
>> simply checkout that using svn with something like:
>> svn co https://svn.qgis.org/repos/qgis/branches/
>> advanced_editing_branch adv_edit
>> the
John C. Tull wrote:
> In order to checkout and build the advanced editing branch, do you simply
> checkout that using svn with something like:
> svn co https://svn.qgis.org/repos/qgis/branches/
> advanced_editing_branch adv_edit
> then build from that directory (adv_edit) as normal?
Yes.
> I t
On Nov 3, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Marco Hugentobler wrote:
> Hi Rhys,
>
> Nice to hear your are using the new editing features!
> I'm also keen on merging the advanced editing branch soon. However,
> as the
> branch contains some bigger changes, I think it is better to wait
> after the
> first bugf
Hi Rhys
Yes we will follow the same strategy for all branches that are
candidates for merging into trunk. Once Marco gives the word that he
is ready, we can create packages and put the advanced editing branch
'out there' for wider testing.
Regards
Tim
2007/11/2, Rhys Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Speaking of different branches:
how about including the advanced editing branch? I've (me and about 4
other folks in office) have been using it extensively since late July.
We have had no problems/bugs to report. I know that 5 people using it
doesn't mean it is ready for prime time, but I'm sure w
Hi
We will be making test packages for the transparency branch (which
will contain everything from trunk merged in too). We will put these
out for public comment and bug testing. Once we are happy that the
raster transparency branch is stable, works as expected and does not
cause any other problem
Tim,
could the new 0.9.1 include the transparency raster branch?
It seems that Peter Ersts has these tools pretty advanced.
It's actually very difficult to use QGis for real work with imagery
without having these tools available.
Thank you all for your work!
Agus
Tim Sutton escribió:
> Hi
>
>
Hi
Was anyone able to test Toms patch? Can we go ahead and apply it to
trunk? We would like to do a follow up release of QGIS 0.9.1 in the
next few days - in particular to provide updated binaries to address
some GRASS issues Martin fixed, and to provide a Toms WMS fix.
Best regards
Tim
2007/10
Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> I'd like to test it. Where's the patch?
Here's a patch for the current (r3707) trunk:
http://www.compassowl.com/qgis_wms_async.diff
Tom
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.qgis.org
http://lists.qgis.org/cgi-bin/mailma
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 30. Oct 2007 at 14:49:30 -0400, Tom Elwertowski wrote:
> This looks like a bug which was reported for Mac OS X a while ago. I
> have a patch which is essentially complete but I don't have the
> capability to build QGIS for Windows. If you or someone else can do a
> source build,
10 matches
Mail list logo