Morning David,
Could your software run under QemuLator? That works fine with Linux
and I think it accepts SMSQ now.
I don't actually know. I'm used to QPC now and having paid for it all those
years ago, would love to continue using it if I can. I might give it a try, but
as I say, I'd prefer
Morning Marcel,
Actually I prefer not a frigging chance ;-) Not from me, anyway.
I thought something like that would be the reaction - and I can't say I blame
you!
Well, step 1 would be to get the whole assembler stuff compiling
under linux, which given that linux uses a completely different
Hi Marcel,
IIRC that might be a design limitation of Windows (and perhaps most
other OSes) but probably not of the Core Duo chip.
I wasn't sure whether it was the chip ir the OS. Thanks for the confirmation.
Norman.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
Hi Marcel,
Not entirely true, using a processor feature called PAE (Physical
address extension) some Windows server version can address more memory
(up to 64GB).
That's the patch I was thinking of, but I was under the impression it only
allowed an extra i GB of RAM to be addressed. As an
hitchies wrote:
Tony said -
What a con!
===
I'll take that as an apology then.
Apology for what? My you are sensitive today. I was not criticising
anyone.
Tony
--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://firshman.co.uk
- Original Message -
From: Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC
David McCann wrote:
Could your software run under QemuLator? That works fine with Linux and
I think it accepts SMSQ
David McCann wrote:
Could your software run under QemuLator? That works fine with Linux and
I think it accepts SMSQ now.
Since when is there a Linux version of QemuLator?
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Since when is there a Linux version of QemuLator?
http://qemulator.createweb.de/
I suspect it's not the same one though!!!
:-)
Norman.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Tony said -
What a con!
===
I'll take that as an apology then.
Also, why separate DELL only for the (valid) flaming? - surely MAXTOR need
to learn something too regarding their own advertised product support which
they honour not?
Not raining in Wales though!
John
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 13:10 +0100, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Since when is there a Linux version of QemuLator?
There isn't: what I meant was it works with Wine, unlike QPC.
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might give it a try, but as I say, I'd prefer QPC.
Would
10 matches
Mail list logo
