Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Norman Dunbar wrote:
Ok, to be really honest, I can think of one reason - someone will have
to write it as part of SMSQ.
Yes, that and that basically ALL applications would have to be updated
to make use of the new facilities. Difficult to pull off. One more
Ralf Reköndt wrote:
Hmm, why have all apps to know, where they are?
They don't need to know where they are, but most apps I use work with
files, be it source-code, spread-sheets, word-processor documents, you
name it.
If the system let them believe, they are in their root (if
necessary), they
Of course, the 36 character limit is always there, even in the TK3 way. All
was done mostly for those programs which have/had hard coded file
destinations in there program or data files. For that, it was the best
solution (even Professional Publisher is such dirty in some of its files).
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Imagine not being able to use QPAC2 anymore because the directory you
want to navigate to is too deeply nested in the tree.
That was what I had in mind when I suggested that we also change the
directory separator. So if the path is full of '/' (for example) then
those are
Good day, Norman,
well, I was a bit annoyed, because I have sent Tony the sources (just to
open his ideas), explained, why it should be better to use a different
system esp. for WIN files, but there was no comment. Perheps he has finished
the WIN driver for the Miraculix hard disk and do not
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi Dilwyn,
I may one, somewhere ...
Was it supplied in binder of some type ? Just so I know what to look
out for.
Does anyone have an old printed Quanta Library Guide I could have or
borrow? (for my collection).
--
Dilwyn
The Quanta Library was included in the Welcome Book with occasional
revisions issued loose.
I lost mine years ago.
John Taylor
On 25 Nov 2008, at 20:48, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I may one, somewhere ...
Was it supplied in binder of some type ? Just so I know what to
look out
for.